dated 22.04.2013 and letter dated 20.03.2014 by
simply saying that some typographically mistakes have crept in
therefore letter dated 22.04.2013 is withdrawn. Reasons to believe ... sending "Reasons to Believe" vide letter dated 22.04.2013,
some typographically mistakes had been crept in. Therefore letter dated
22.04.2013 was withdrawn. (Refer
They submitted that the
complainant cannot take advantage of typographical mistake that had taken
place while printing the Insurance Policy. They submitted that however they ... 3996.90 to Rs.3825/-. He submitted that it is typographical
mistake that was committed by the concerned clerk while preparing the policy.
He submitted
merely on account of typographical mistake which
has no effect on the sum total of amount of Rs. 17,78,69,027/-received ... aggregate of cash by Rs. 84.61 lakhs
merely on account of typographical mistake which was not so. It was further submitted that
the relief granted
after considering these facts and held it to be typographically mistake by
observing in Para 7.8 and 7.9 as under: -
"7.8 The assessment order ... position to mention
the same. Moreover, this was only a typographical
mistake. In all fairness, the Assessing Officer
intended to make assessment on the assessee
order dated 18.11.2015
on the ground that there is a typographical mistake in the order of the Tribunal in
mentioning the " Assessment Year ... perused the material on record. We find that there is
a typographical mistake occurred while typing the Assessment Year in the caption of
the appeal
said application has brought to our notice that there is a typographical mistake in the judgment and order dated 26/04/2017 ... said order) the word "affirmed" has been written by typographical mistake in respect of the interim order which should be replaced
PRESIDENT
This Miscellaneous Application has been filed for getting some typographical mistakes corrected in the judgment dated 24/07/2017 passed by us in connection ... judgment, it was mentioned as DCDRF, Kolkata, Unit-II as a typographical mistake. Moreover, there is another typographical mistake in the 22nd line from
instance of the appellants wherein it has been pointed out certain typographical mistakes in the judgment of A/455 of 2016 delivered ... instead of 88 sq. ft. which are undoubtedly typographical mistakes remained in the said judgment through our oversight. Hence, in view of the prayer
Tribunal in earlier year restricted the addition.
Thus, there is no mistake in this part of the order of the Tribunal ... para 84, rate has been mentioned as 0.38%. There is a
typographical mistake and we direct the guarantee commission should be
restricted
Sales Tax Department
Government of Maharashtra. The assessee also explained the typographical
mistake in the Registration number of vehicles used in transportation of the
Steel
