filed by plaintiff is a forged document, if so, its
effects? OPD.
13. In respect of the said document, the claim of the plaintiff ... from both the sides is
that memorandum of understanding is the unsigned document. In any
case, this document cannot be relied on either
Same document as of
01.11.2007 this DW1/C but the writing
Original application form was document and content on it i.e.
proved ... admitted by the defendant as EX.P3
which is an unsigned document, and no objection was mentioned at that stage
stating that
affidavit in her examination-in-
chief and has proposed to exhibit seventeen documents ... which are unsigned documents have been de-exhibited.
She has been cross-examined at great length. PW-2 is Ms Veena Mallick
who has filed
Same document as of
01.11.2007 this DW1/C but the writing
Original application form was document and content on it i.e.
proved ... admitted by the defendant as EX.P3
which is an unsigned document, and no objection was mentioned at that stage
stating that
photocopy and also that legal notice Ex. PW2/5
was unsigned document. The invoice Ex. PW2/2 is not denied in written statement ... raised by defendant at the time of exhibition of the
documents. The document Ex. PW2/2 is therefore, not disputed. In respect of legal
copy is not a signed document. It is only a
printed document. There is nothing to suggest that this document
was ever filed before ... document after obtaining the same from the concerned
court. An unsigned document that too without reference material to
show any connectivity with the concerned court
also admitted the aforesaid fact. It is settled law that an unsigned
document has no evidentiary value. Further, MW-1's voluntary
deposition that
Digitally signed
by NIRJA
BHATIA
Date: 2026.03.18
18:47:41 +0545
documents with application U/o VI Rule 17 CPC was again
Page ... filed as the only proof against the outstanding is also an
unsigned document. From the nature of the document it is
doubted that
Buyers' Agreement, dated 01.07.2016 (Ex.PW1/B)
being an unsigned document is not admissible in evidence and as such is of
no consequence
entity. The workman, despite being put to notice and
despite his down documents showing otherwise, vehemently continued
with his claim that he was an employee ... confirmation Ex.WW1/11 and Ex.WW1/12 are
unsigned documents and have not been duly proved by the workman.
17. At this
