passing the impugned order on framing of charge skipped the relevance
of videography conducted by Central Team, same was seized by CBI.
He further submitted ... Learned counsels has pointed out
that the inspection team has carried out videography and the said set of
videography is not supplied to the Petitioners
member of the team visited various
rooms. They took photographs and videography from inside as well
CBI Vs. Dharamvir Khattar & Ors. Page ... plot no. 1, Patel Nagar,
Institutional Area and took the photographs and videography from
the hotel from inside as well as outside. They returned
shop/ flat in the building in question; (iv) Witnesses of
photography and videography of property; (v) other witnesses.
Witnesses who supplied the building material ... structural changes have been made.
Witnesses of photography and videography of property
53. Under the above category three witnesses were examined by the
prosecution which
while passing
impugned order on framing of charge skipped the relevance of videography
conducted by MCI, same was seized by CBI.
8. Learned Senior Counsel ... senior counsels has pointed out
that the inspection team has carried out videography and the said set of
videography is not supplied to the Petitioners
team having visited the site for inspection on 22/05/2009;
videography having been done in the Motel on 24/03/2009 and also ... preparation of cassette of videography Ex P1. Also, accused
Virender Kumar Khosla stated that the completion certificate, copy Ex
PW1/A and its original
along with rough site plan Ex. PW
5/C. The videography with respect to borewell situated at near
Aggarwal Dharamshala is also contained ... report of the expert PW 5 D.V. Reddy
and stated that videography is manipulated and prepared in CBI office.
Also, the evidence
along with BDPO Machhiwara and official witnesses and officers
of Minining Department. Videography was done at the spot.
Photographs were also taken. It was also
statements were recorded u/s 161 of Code of Criminal
Procedure and videography of her statements was also done in a
(Downloaded
work done at CSD Store, Rohini, Delhi, separate
payment was made. The videography was got done but unfortunately,
videography was not proved on record, which
done on the same day i.e.
8.8.03. During inspection, videography of the premises
was carried out and the same was recorded in a video ... submitted by appellants' counsel that the videography of 31st
December, 2003 has revealed that R.K.Rishi, Investigating Officer (PW-
Crl.A.18/2013
