appears that because of
first party approaching wrong forums and filing claim petition
under wrong provision of law there is abnormal delay on the
part ... made
sincere efforts about challenging the dismissal order but before
the wrong forum. It appears that first party might not have
been properly given advise
appears that because of
first party approaching wrong forums and filing claim petition
under wrong provision of law there is abnormal delay on the
part ... made
sincere efforts about challenging the dismissal order but before
the wrong forum. It appears that first party might not have
been properly given advise
appears that because of
first party approaching wrong forums and filing claim petition
under wrong provision of law there is abnormal delay on the
part ... made
sincere efforts about challenging the dismissal order but before
the wrong forum. It appears that first party might not have
been properly given advise
appears that because of
first party approaching wrong forums and filing claim petition
under wrong provision of law there is abnormal delay on the
part ... made
sincere efforts about challenging the dismissal order but before
the wrong forum. It appears that first party might not have
been properly given advise
before the District Court, once again approached the
wrong forum. When the confirmation order was passed in
the year 1999 itself, in spite of approaching ... that appeal lies before
the Standing Committee, once again approached the
wrong forum. When such being the case, the Trial Court
while rejecting the application
years from the date of instituting the original suit
before wrong forum and further issued notice to Corporation on
6.12.2013. The same makes it clear ... that right from 2014 to 2018 he was pursuing
remedy before wrong forum, the order impugned is contrary to
settled law and is liable
limitation,
though the appeal is filed within limitation and chosen the
wrong Forum, the limitation can be exempted under Section 14
of the Limitation
petitioner in respect of the
cognizance order passed by a wrong forum/Court which is not
allegedly designated to try the cases under
there being a bonafide mistake in filing the application
before the wrong forum and the respondent's counsel
- 26 -
COMAP
accepted the termination but
was agitating the same; albeit in a wrong forum.
42.6. In contrast, in those cases where there was
no agitation
