Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 8, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Ramukutti vs The Inspector Of Police on 1 November, 2021

Author: G. Ilangovan

Bench: G. Ilangovan

                                                                 Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.4872 & 4873 of 2021


                           BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 01.11.2021

                                                    CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. ILANGOVAN

                                        Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.4872 & 4873 of 2021

                     Crl.O.P(MD)No.4872 of 2021:
                     1.Ramukutti
                     2.Balamurugan
                     3.Sankara Narayanan                              Petitioners/Accused
                                                                                   No.1 to 3
                                                        Vs
                     1.The Inspector of Police,
                       Puliangudi Police Station,
                       Tenkasi District.
                       Crime No.12/2020                               Respondent /
                                                                      Complainant

                     2.Subramaniyan                                   Respondent No.2/
                                                                      Defacto Complainant
                     Crl.O.P(MD)No.4873 of 2021:
                     1.Subramaniyan
                     2.Janaki                                         Petitioners/Accused
                                                                      Nos.1 & 2
                                                        Vs
                     1.The State represented by
                       The Inspector of Police,
                       Puliangudi Police Station,
                       Madurai.
                       (Crime No.13 of 2020)                          Respondent No.1/
                                                                           Complainant

                     2.Ramukutti                               Respondent No.2/Defacto
                                                                            Complainant

                     1/5
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
                                                                     Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.4872 & 4873 of 2021


                     PRAYER in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4872 of 2021: Petition filed under Section
                     482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for records relating to Crime
                     No.12 of 2020, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Puliangudi Police
                     Station, Tenkasi District and quash the same.


                     PRAYER in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4873 of 2021: Petition filed under Section
                     482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for records relating to Crime
                     No.13 of 2020, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Puliangudi Police
                     Station, Tenkasi District and quash the same.


                               For Petitioners          : Mr.K.Prabhu
                               For R2                   : M/s.S.Ragaventhre
                                            (in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4872 of 2021)

                               For Petitioners          : Mr.K.Prabhu
                               For R2                   : Mr.S.Senthil Sankaranatha Kumar
                                            (in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4873 of 2021)

                               For R1                   : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi
                                                          Government Advocate (Crl.side)
                                                    (in both Crl.O.Ps)

                                               COMMON ORDER


Heard both sides.

2.These Criminal Original Petitions have been filed to quash the First Information Report in Crime Nos. 12 & 13 of 2020, on the file 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.4872 & 4873 of 2021 of the respondent police, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 341, 294(b), 379, 506 (i) IPC and Section 3 of Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 and Section 294(b), 355 and 506(i) IPC respectively.

3.The second respondent / defacto complainant as well as the petitioners/accused in both Criminal Original Petitions are present before this Court and they are identified by the respective learned counsel and both the parties have filed joint compromise memos stating that the matters in issue between them has been amicably resolved and the defacto complainant in Crl.O.P(MD)No.4872 of 2021, namely Subramanian would submit that he received the articles that had been taken away by the accused persons and therefore, the second respondent / defacto complainant is not willing to prosecute the case and therefore would pray for quashing the FIRs.

4. The compromise memos are filed before this Court and the parties are also present at the learned Additional Public Prosecutor office and their identity has also been verified through video conference. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.4872 & 4873 of 2021 Since the matters in issue has been compromised between the parties and the victim has also suffered simple injury and no purpose will be served in keeping the First Information Report pending.

5. In the result, by recording the compromise, these Criminal Original Petitions are allowed and the proceedings in Crime Nos. 12 & 13 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police are quashed. The joint compromise memos shall form part and parcel of this order.

01.11.2021 Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vrn NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To:-

1.The Inspector of Police, Puliangudi Police Station, Tenkasi District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/ Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.4872 & 4873 of 2021 G. ILANGOVAN, J.

vrn Common order made in Crl.O.P(MD)Nos.4872 & 4873 of 2021 01.11.2021 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/