Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 5]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Ritu Raj vs The State Of H.P. & Others on 23 July, 2020

Author: Vivek Singh Thakur

Bench: Vivek Singh Thakur

                                                      1




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
                              SHIMLA

                                         CWPOA No. 7759 of 2019




                                                                                .

                                         Date of Decision: July 23, 2020


    Ritu Raj                                                                        ...Petitioner.





                                                  Versus

    The State of H.P. & others                                                 ..Respondents.





    Coram:
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.
    Whether approved for reporting?1

    For the Petitioner:                  Ms.Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice

                                         Mr.A.K. Gupta, Advocate, through Video
                                         Conferencing.

    For the Respondents:                 Mr.Raju Ram Rahi, Deputy Advocate


                                         General, for respondents No.1 to 5,
                                         through Video Conferencing.

                                         Mr.Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate,




                                         for proposed respondent No.6-Shimla Jal
                                         Prabandhan Nigam Limited, through





                                         Video Conferencing.


    Vivek Singh Thakur, J (oral)
CMP-T No.1662 of 2020

This application has been filed on behalf of proposed respondent No.6-Shimla Jal Prabandhan Nigam Limited (SJPNL) for its impleadment on the ground that now a separate entity has been constituted and entire area with the assests and liabilities and the management of the organization has been vested with 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2020 20:21:52 :::HCHP 2

SJPNL and now Municipal Corporation, Shimla, has no role to play in the matter as SJPNL has taken over the complete establishment of water and sewerage system, which was earlier .

with the Municipal Corporation, Shimla and now respondent No.3 is working under the applicant-SJPNL.

2. No reply is intended to be filed, rather no objection has been communicated on behalf of non-applicant/petitioner as well as respondents-State, for allowing the application.

3. Considering entire facts and circumstances, application is allowed and SJPNL is permitted to be arrayed as respondent No.6. Application stands disposed of.

CMP-T No. 1663 of 2020

4. In view of subsequent events, not pressed and dismissed as withdrawn.

CWPOA No.7759 of 2019

5. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a comprehensive writ petition on the same cause of action. Prayer is not opposed.

6. In view of above, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.

July 23, 2020 (Purohit) ::: Downloaded on - 23/07/2020 20:21:52 :::HCHP