Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Kalpana Devi Wife Of Shri Vijay Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh Through on 16 December, 2021

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Satyen Vaidya

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
                     ON THE 16th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021
                              BEFORE




                                                        .
           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN





                                 &
                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA





                CIVIL WRIT PETITION No. 2757 OF 2020.
    Between:-




    KALPANA DEVI WIFE OF SHRI VIJAY KUMAR,
    RESIDENT OF VILLAGE AND POST OFFICE TIARA,
    TEHSIL KANGRA, DISTRICT KANGRA, H.P.

                                              ....PETITIONER.

    (BY MR. RAJIV JIWAN, SR. ADVOCATE WITH MR.
    PRAHSHANT SHARMA, ADOVCATE)
          AND



    1.   STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH THROUGH
         SECRETARY   (INDUSTRIES) TO   THE




         GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH,
         SHIMLA-2.





    2.   DIRECTOR     INDUSTRIES,         HIMACHAL





         PRADESH, SHIMLA-1.

    3.   STATE GEOLOGIST, HIMACHAL PRADESH,
         SHIMLA-1.

                                             ....RESPONDENTS.
         (BY MR. ASHOK SHARMA, ADVOCATE
         GENERAL WITH MR. RAJINDER DOGRA, SR.
         ADDL. A.G., MR. VINOD THAKUR AND MR.
         SHIV PAL MANHANS, ADDL. A. GS.)




                                       ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:26:55 :::CIS
                                   ...2...




                                                            .

                 This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble





    Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, delivered the following:-

                            ORDER

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner under instructions states that the petitioner does not want to press the instant petition as the show cause notice issued by the department clearly bringing out therein that the FIR lodged against her husband has been quashed in pursuance to the order passed in Cr.MMO No.354 of 2020 on 7.09.2021. The prayer being innocuous is allowed.

2. Consequently, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications also stand disposed of.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 16th December, 2021.

(jai) ::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:26:55 :::CIS