Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Jharkhand High Court

Ferdinand Kispotta vs The State Of Jharkhand Through C B I on 19 February, 2016

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI      
                                        B.A. No.7180 of 2015 
           Ferdinand Kispotta                                                         ...... Petitioner
                                                          Versus 
           The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I.                                        ...... Opposite Party
                                                    ­­­­­­­­­
           CORAM:  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY
                                                  ­­­­­­­­­
           For the Petitioner           : Mr.  Krishna Kumar Bhatt, Advocate
           For the C.B.I.                         : Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate 
                                                  ­­­­­­­­­­­­
 11/19.02

.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

It reveals that petitioner has been prosecuted with the allegation that he  was involved in forwarding fake invoices against procurement of bitumen and  against those invoices the contractors had obtained payment.  

It is submitted that prayer for bail made on behalf of this petitioner was  lastly rejected on 10.02.2015 vide order passed in B.A. No.8180 of 2014 giving  liberty   to   renew   the   prayer   for   bail,   if   the   trial   is   not   concluded   within   six  months from the date of presentation of that order.   More than one year has  elapsed after passing of said rejection order but till date the trial has not been  concluded.  The petitioner has already remained in custody for more than three  and   half   years   and   he   was   posted   as   Assistant   Engineer   under   Road  Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand.  

Learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I. has opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the period of detention of petitioner in jail custody and delay  in disposal of the case, I feel inclined to give opportunity to the petitioner to  contest   the   case   by   remaining   outside   the   jail.     In   the   circumstances,   above  named petitioner is directed to  be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of  Rs.25,000/­(Rupees   Twenty   Five   Thousand)   with   two   sureties   of   the   like  amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned Ranjana Asthana, A.J.C.  ­cum­   Special   Judge,   C.B.I.,   Ranchi   in   connection   with   R.C.   Case  No.14(A)/2009 (R) with the condition that he shall remain physically present  on each date falling within next six months and he shall co­operate with the  trial.  The trial judge shall proceed with the trial by giving shorter adjournments  to conclude the trial and the C.B.I. shall produce all its witnesses, if possible,  within next six months.  

                    

                           (D. N. Upadhyay, J.)                 NKC