Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Sudheep.M vs State Of Kerala on 12 November, 2018

Author: Mary Joseph

Bench: Mary Joseph

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                             PRESENT

             THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MARY JOSEPH

   MONDAY ,THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 21ST KARTHIKA, 1940

                   Bail Appl..No. 7585 of 2018

  CRIME NO. 39/2018 OF Mananthavady Excise Range Office, Wayanad



PETITIONER/ACCUSED :


             SUDHEEP.M.,
             AGED 33 YEARS
             S/O RATNA KUMAR, MANIKKOTH HOUSE, HOUSE NO.
             792(37/849), KALOOR THAZHAM PARAMBA BHAGAM, PUTHIYARA
             DESOM, KASABA VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.

             BY ADVS.
             SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR
             SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN



RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

             STATE OF KERALA,
             REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
             KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI - 682 031.



OTHER PRESENT:
             PP. SRI. S. SAJJU


THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12.11.2018,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
 Bail Appl..No. 7585 of 2018

                                       2


                                  JUDGMENT

This is the third application seeking regular bail. The petitioner was involved in Crime No.39/2018 of Excise Range Office, Mananthavady registered for the offences punishable under Section 8(c) read with 22(c) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short 'the NDPS Act').

2. The petitioner was found in possession of 600 capsules of Pyeevon Spas Plus and 96 Capsules of Spasmo-Proxyvon Plus containing Tramadol, a psychotropic substance without any authority in a Karnataka State Transport Corporation Bus at Tholpetti Excise Check Post in Thirunelli Village, Mananthavady Taluk. The petitioner was arrested from the spot and was remanded to judicial custody. The investigation is on its move and not yet completed. The statutory period is not yet over. Being commercial quantity, bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act is very well applicable in the case on hand. In view of the bar, I am declined to grant bail to the petitioner at this point of time. In the result, this application stands dismissed.

Sd/-

MARY JOSEPH JUDGE ttb