Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Delhi

Savita Jain, Delhi vs Acit, Circle- 57(1), New Delhi on 14 February, 2020

          IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
              DELHI BENCHES "FRIDAY": DELHI

     BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
                          AND
         SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

             Stay Application No.109/Del./2020
                        Arising out of
     ITA.No.911/Del./2019 - Assessment Year 2015-2016

Smt. Savita Jain,                      The ACIT, Circle - 57 (1),
Delhi. PAN AAIPJ9618B
                                vs., Vikas Bhawan,
C/o. Shri Akhlesh Kumar,
Advocate, 206-207, Ansal               I.P. Estate,
Satyam, RDC, Ghaziabad.
                                       New Delhi - 201 001.
PIN - 201 002.
        (Applicant)                           (Respondent)

                                     Shri Vinay Verma And
                   For Assessee :
                                     Shri Rohit Tiwari, Advocates
               For Revenue : Shri Akhilesh Gupta, Sr. D.R.

             Date of Hearing : 14.02.2020
      Date of Pronouncement : 14.02.2020

                               ORDER

PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.

We have heard the Learned Representatives of both the parties.

2. The assessee filed the present stay application seeking stay against the outstanding demand of 2 SA.No.109/Del./2020 Smt. Savita Jain, Delhi.

Rs.1,47,89,370/- for the A.Y. 2015-2016. Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that the assessee has already paid Rs.44,46,194/- and after adding interest under section 220(2), the balance demand comes to Rs.1,04,58,198/-. Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted that assessee is willing to pay Rs.20 lakhs more to the Revenue Department.

3. After considering the facts of the case above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, we grant stay against the outstanding demand for a period of four months or disposal of the appeal whichever expire earlier, subject to payment of Rs.20 lakhs by assessee to the Revenue Department on or before 29.02.2020. Appeal is already fixed for hearing on 18.03.2020. Assessee shall not seek unnecessary adjournments in the matter. Paper book, if any, be filed as per Rules. Stay application of the Assessee is allowed with the above conditions. Copy of the Order be provided to both the parties.

4. In the result, Stay Application of the Assessee allowed.

3

SA.No.109/Del./2020 Smt. Savita Jain, Delhi.

Order pronounced in the open Court.

    Sd/-                              Sd/-
   (O.P. KANT)                       (BHAVNESH SAINI)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER                   JUDICIAL MEMBER

Delhi, Dated 14th February, 2020 VBP/-

Copy to

1. The appellant

2. The respondent

3. CIT(A) concerned

4. CIT concerned

5. D.R. ITAT "FRIDAY" Bench

6. Guard File // BY Order // Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Delhi Benches, Delhi.