Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Commissioner Of Central Excise, ... vs M/S Sri Saritha Synthetics And ... on 3 February, 2011

        

 
CUSTOMS, EXCISE & SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH
BANGALORE

Final Order No .    20171 / 2014    

Appeal(s) Involved:

E/553/2008-SM 

[Arising out of Order-in-Appeal No. 42/2008 dated 26/05/2008 passed by Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Appeals), Visakhapatnam]

Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax - VISAKHAPATNAM-I
CENTRAL EXCISE BUILDING
PORT AREA
VISAKHAPATNAM-530035	Appellant(s)
	
	Versus	
M/s SRI SARITHA SYNTHETICS AND INDUSTRIES LTD 
ANTHAKAPALLY, RAJAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DIST. (A.P.) 	Respondent(s)

Appearance:

Mr. N. Jagdish, A.R. For the Appellant None For the Respondent CORAM:
HON'BLE SHRI B.S.V.MURTHY, TECHNICAL MEMBER ________________________________________ Date of Hearing: 03/02/2014 Date of Decision: 03/02/2014 When the matter was called, none appeared on behalf of the respondent. On going through the records and hearing learned AR on behalf of Revenue (appellant), I find that the appeal can be disposed of even in the absence of the respondent.

2. Learned AR submits that the amount involved in this case is Rs. 4,57,756/-. Even though this appeal was filed prior to issue of the Boards Circular prescribing mandatory limits for filing the appeal by Revenue, in the light of the Honble High Court of Karnataka in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Bangalore vs. Ranka & Ranka reported in 2012 (284) E.L.T. 185 (Kar.)], I have to hold that the appeal is not maintainable. Accordingly, appeal is rejected as not maintainable.

(Order dictated and pronounced in open court) (B.S.V. MURTHY) TECHNICAL MEMBER /vc/