Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ramphal vs Union Of India on 8 October, 2015

Author: Shiva Kirti Singh

Bench: Shiva Kirti Singh

     ITEM NO.51                               COURT NO.14                           SECTION XIV

                                S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                I N D I A
                                        RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Petition(s)              for   Special        Leave    to    Appeal   (C)      Diary    No(s).
     42560/2014

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated
     23/08/2011 in LAA No. 137/2011 passed by the High Court of Delhi
     at New Delhi)

     RAMPHAL                                                                        Petitioner(s)

                                                       VERSUS

     UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.                                                        Respondent(s)
     (Office report for directions)

     Date : 08/10/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH
                                                       [IN CHAMBERS]


     For Petitioner(s)                       Mr. Nitin Kumar Thakur,Adv.(Not Present)


     For Respondent(s)


                                      The Court made the following
                                               O R D E R

Nobody appears for the petitioner. In spite of time granted earlier, by ways of last opportunity, defects have not been removed.

Four weeks' time is granted to learned counsel for the petitioner for removing the defects, failing which the Special Leave Petition shall stand dismissed.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by (Neeta) (Saroj Saini) Neeta Sapra Date: 2015.10.08 16:43:29 IST
                         Sr. P.A.                                             Court Master
Reason: