Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Jacob vs State on 7 September, 2011

Bench: V. M. Sahai, Ks Jhaveri

  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

LPA/369/2003	 3/ 3	JUDGMENT 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

LETTERS
PATENT APPEAL No. 369 of 2003
 

In


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 10111 of 2002
 

 
 
For
Approval and Signature:  
 
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI  
 


 

 


 

HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
 
 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

1
		
		 
			 

Whether
			Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

2
		
		 
			 

To
			be referred to the Reporter or not ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

3
		
		 
			 

Whether
			their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

4
		
		 
			 

Whether
			this case involves a substantial question of law as to the
			interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order
			made thereunder ?
		
	

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

5
		
		 
			 

Whether
			it is to be circulated to the civil judge ?
		
	

 

 
=========================================================


 

JACOB
K PHILIP - Appellant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
NK MAJMUDAR for
Appellant(s) : 1, 
MR JK SHAH AGP for Respondent(s) : 1 -
2. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 06/09/2011 

 

ORAL
JUDGMENT 

(Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)

1. We have heard Mr. SB Suthar learned counsel holding brief of Mr. NK Majmudar for the appellant and Mr. JK Shah learned AGP for the respondent.

2. This intra Court Letters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 25.11.2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in S.C.A. No.10111 of 2002 by which the learned Single Judge has recorded a finding that in absence of any Rule, interest could not be awarded on Commuted Pension.

3. Learned counsel for the appellant could not place any Rule before us, which demonstrates that on Commuted Pension, interest is payable. However, the appellant has been paid interest on Gratuity amount. Learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition summarily. We do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge. This appeal is devoid of any merits and is, accordingly, dismissed.

[V.M. SAHAI, J.] [K. S. JHAVERI, J.] Pravin/*     Top