Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Johann Tuchler vs Superintentdent Of Customs on 23 May, 2012

Author: N.Ananda

Bench: N. Ananda

                                1


   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

          DATED THIS THE      23RD   DAY OF MAY 2012

                            BEFORE

           THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANANDA

             CRIMINAL PETITION No.1929/2012

BETWEEN:

Johann Tuchier
Sb Hens Tuchier
Peckchan House, Boarang
Near Pekchon University
Pnompenh, Cambodia                            ...   Petitioner

(By Sri Kiran V.R., Advocate)

AND:

Superintendent of Customs
AIR Intelligence Unit
Bangalore International Airport
Bangalore
(Rep. by Spi. P.P. learned Senior
Counsel Sri Urval Ramanand).                 ...    Respondent

       This petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C., praying
 to quash the order dated 10.11.2011 and charge framed
dated 24.11.2011 and direct the Sessions Judge, Spl. Court
for NDPS to club this case with the other two cases i.e.
SpLC.C.Nos.136/2010 and 137/20 10 and conduct the trial
jointly and dispose off the case expeditiously.

     This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court
made the following:
                                  2


                           ORDER

This petition is filed against the order made in Spi. C. C. No. 135 / 2010, rejecting the application of petitioner to jointly frame charges in Spl.C.C.No.135/2010, Spl.C.C.No.136/2010 and 137/2010.

2. The learned trial judge on consideration of entire records has held that offences alleged against accused in the aforestated cases are distinct. It is also seen from the records that prosecution has not invoked Section 34 or 120-B LP.C.

3. The learned Special Judge has held that evidence in each case would be recorded one after the other as witnesses are common and all the three cases would be decided on the same day by separate judgments.

4. I do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. Therefore, the petition is dismissed.

JUDGE Np!-