Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sayeed Asad Salim vs Multan Sabha And Others on 22 July, 2009

Author: Sabina

Bench: Sabina

Civil Revision No. 3023 of 2009 (O&M)                                      1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH


                               Civil Revision No.3023 of 2009 (O&M)

                               Date of Decision: July 22, 2007



Sayeed Asad Salim                                  ...........Petitioner

                                         Versus

Multan Sabha and others                            ..........Respondents



Coram: Hon'ble Mrs.Justice Sabina


Present: Mr.Sanjay Verma,Advocate,for the petitioner.
                          --

Sabina, J. (oral) Plaintiffs filed a suit for possession of Shops in question. Plaintiff No.1 was Multan Sabha and it has filed the suit through Har Narain Makhija. Plaintiff No.2 was Har Narain Makhija being President and Member of the Sabha. During the pendency of the suit, an application has been filed by the applicant-Yogesh Mukhija, ( new President) that he be allowed to pursue the case being the President of the Sabha on the ground that Har Narain Mukhija who was President has since been died. Vide the impugned order dated 16.4.2009, the application filed by Yogesh Mukhija was allowed. Hence, the present revision petition.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, I am of the opinion that no interference by this Court is warranted.

Admittedly, Har Narain Makhija, who has filed the suit being President of Multan Sabha, has since been died. Yogesh Mukhija vide application prayed that he may be substituted as plaintiff in the suit as now Civil Revision No. 3023 of 2009 (O&M) 2 he was the new President of Plaintiff's Sabha.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the impugned order does not suffer from vice of the illegality and calls for no interference by this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

Dismissed.

(Sabina) Judge July 22, 2009 arya