Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Dalit Manavadhikar Kendra Samiti vs State Of Rajasthan . on 6 November, 2015

Bench: Madan B. Lokur, Uday Umesh Lalit

                                                                  1


                                             IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                                            CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

                                          WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO.122 OF 2013


                         DALIT MANAVADHIKAR KENDRA SAMITI                                           PETITIONER(s)

                                                               VERSUS

                         STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.                                                  RESPONDENT(s)


                                                           O R D E R

In this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner – Dalit Manavadhikar Kendra Samiti has prayed for several reliefs. The principal relief is for a writ of mandamus directing the State of Rajasthan to appoint a Secretary to the State Human Rights Commission (for short “the Commission”) in accordance with Section 21(3) of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 (for short “the Act”) as well as to fill up all vacant sanctioned posts in the Commission in terms of paragraph 11 of the writ petition. In paragraph 11, it has been pointed out that a large number of posts of staff in various categories, totalling about 67, are lying vacant.

By an order dated 9th December, 2013, notice was issued to the respondents limited to this prayer only. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sanjay Kumar Date: 2015.11.17

During the pendency of these proceedings, we were 17:55:26 IST Reason: informed that apart from the fact that there is no or inadequate staff with the Commission, the Commission was 2 without the services of the Chairman since 16th July, 2010. We were also given to understand that the Human Rights Courts have not been set up as required under Section 13 of the Act. We had recorded this in our order dated 18th September, 2015 and had directed the State of Rajasthan to let us know the progress by way of an affidavit.

Today, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State of Rajasthan says that for some reason the affidavit could not be filed, but he has handed over to us a Warrant of Appointment dated 20th October, 2015 issued by Shri Kalyan Singh, Governor of Rajasthan appointing Shri Prakash Tatia, retired Chief Justice of the Jharkhand High Court as the Chairperson of the Commission for a term of five years from the date on which he enters office or until he attains the age of seventy years, whichever is earlier. Learned Additional Advocate General says that retired Chief Justice Shri Prakash Tatia has accepted the appointment and to the best of his knowledge he has also entered upon his office.

The Warrant of Appointment is taken on record. Learned Additional Advocate General has also handed over a notification dated 5th April, 2013 (in Hindi) to the effect that Human Rights Courts have been set up in every District of the State and the District and Sessions 3 Judges have been designated as the District and Session Judges for their respective boundaries as Human Rights Courts.

This notification dated 5th April, 2013 (in Hindi) is also taken on record.

With regard to the staff shortage, learned Additional Advocate General has informed us that today there are 18 sanctioned posts that are lying vacant. He says that the recruitment rules proposed by the Commission are under examination and will be discussed with the Chairperson of the Commission so that all the posts can be filled up and the Commission can start functioning effectively.

In view of the above, we request the Chairperson of the Commission to ensure that the State Government complies with the submissions that have been made before us and vacant posts are filled up at the earliest.

In view of the above, no further relief is sought for in this writ petition and it is accordingly disposed of.

.............................J. (MADAN B. LOKUR) .............................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) NEW DELHI NOVEMBER 06, 2015 4 ITEM NO.301 COURT NO.8 SECTION PIL(W) S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Writ Petition(s)(Criminal) No(s).122/2013 DALIT MANAVADHIKAR KENDRA SAMITI Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for permission to file synopsis and list of dates and office report) Date : 06/11/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MADAN B. LOKUR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT For Petitioner(s) Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.
Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta, AOR For Respondent(s) State Mr. S.S. Shamshery, AAG Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.
Ms. S. Spandana Reddy, Adv. Ms. Ruchi Kohli, AOR RSHRC Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Nikhil Jain, AOR Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv.
Mr. Gagan Deep Sharma, Adv UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.
Pending application(s) stands disposed of.

          (SANJAY KUMAR-I)                       (JASWINDER KAUR)
             AR-CUM-PS                             COURT MASTER
(Signed order is placed on the file)