Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

The Pr.Commissioner Of vs M/S Huawei Technologies India Pvt.Ltd. on 6 December, 2017

Author: P.S.Dinesh Kumar

Bench: P.S.Dinesh Kumar

                            -1-
                                          ITA No.833/2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

     DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017

                        PRESENT

              THE HON'BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH
                 ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

                           AND

     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR

           INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.833/2017

BETWEEN :

1.      THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF
        INCOME-TAX, CIT(A)
        5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
        80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
        BENGALURU - 560 095

2.      THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER
        WARD-11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS
        ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2)
        2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
        80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA
        BENGALURU - 560 095                   ...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND & SRI DILIP, ADVOCATES)

AND :

M/S HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD.
REGD. OFFICE
SY.NOS. 37, 46, 45/3, 45/4 ETC.,
K.NO.1540, KUNDALAHALLI VILLAGE
BENGALURU - 560 037                           ...RESPONDENT
                             -2-
                                           ITA No.833/2017

      THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE
SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 31.05.2017 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU
IN IT(TP)A NO.395/BANG/2013 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR
2008-2009.

     THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION,
THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

                         JUDGMENT

Ag.CJ (Oral):

Learned counsel for the appellants fairly submits that the question raised in this appeal is answered against the appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)]. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Sd/-

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/-

JUDGE LB