Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Meghalaya High Court

Ranjit Chandra Goswami vs . State Of Meghalaya & Ors on 24 July, 2025

Author: W. Diengdoh

Bench: W. Diengdoh

Serial No.06
Daily List
                                HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
                                    AT SHILLONG
  PIL No.1/2025
                                                             Date of Order :24.07.2025

  Ranjit Chandra Goswami                       Vs.           State of Meghalaya & ors
  Coram:
               Hon'ble Mr. Justice I.P. Mukerji, Chief Justice
               Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
  Appearance:
  For the Petitioner                        : Mr. A. Goyal, Adv
  For the Respondents                       : Mr. N. Syngkon, GA with

Ms. S. Laloo, GA Ms. K. Gurung, Adv for R/4,5,7&8 Mrs. T. Yangi B, Sr.Adv for R/6 Mr. D.K. Banerjee, Sr.Adv with Ms. T. Sutnga, Adv for R/9 F

i) Whether approved for Yes/No reporting in Law journals etc.:

ii) Whether approved for publication Yes in press:
Note: For proper public information and transparency, any media reporting this judgment is directed to mention the composition of the bench by name of judges, while reporting this judgment/order. This public interest litigation (PIL) was especially fixed today. Inadvertently, it was notified in the list that it would not be taken up today.
All learned counsel appearing in the matter are present in Court. In those circumstances, we take up this PIL for passing some incidental direction.
Page 1 of 3 This PIL makes an allegation against Amrit Cement Industries Limited, the respondent No.9 of illegal mining of limestone in the Jaintia Hills region.
We admitted the petition on 19th February, 2025 and directed the State to file a report.
When the matter was listed once again on 8th May, 2025, the report was placed before us. In the report it was stated that there was no illegal mining by the respondent No.9. The petitioner denied the contents of this report. Accordingly, we give a chance to him to file a rejoinder to that report. Accordingly, a rejoinder in the form of an affidavit has been filed reiterating the allegations in the petition.
A surrejoinder by the respondent No.9 may be filed by 28 th August, 2025.
It may be observed that the report of the State has been prepared and signed by senior officials in its administration including the Forest department.
We direct this PIL to be listed for hearing on 1 st August, 2025. To enable us to decide the matter, the said report of the government along with the rejoinder affidavit of the petitioner and the surrejoinder may be placed before the Chief Secretary of the State. The Chief Secretary will Page 2 of 3 accordingly instruct learned counsel appearing for the State to make submissions before this Court on which basis we shall pass necessary orders.
              (W. Diengdoh)                         (I.P. Mukerji)
                  Judge                             Chief Justice



Meghalaya
24.07.2025
"Lam DR-PS"




                                                               Page 3 of 3