Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Digjam Ltd vs Ahmedabad-Iii on 5 January, 2023

1|Page

          Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
                 West Zonal Bench At Ahmedabad

                         REGIONAL BENCH- COURT NO. 3

                   Service Tax Appeal No. 429 of 2012-DB

(Arising out of OIO-AHM/STC/003/COM/018/2012     Dated-    22/05/2012   passed   by
Commissioner of Central Excise-AHMEDABAD-III)

Digjam Ltd                                                 ........Appellant
Aerodrome Road, Jamnagar,
Jamnagar, Gujarat
                                       VERSUS


C.C.E. & S.T.-Ahmedabad-iii                               ........Respondent

Custom House... 2nd Floor, Opp. Old Gujarat High Court, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad, Gujarat-380009 APPEARANCE:

Shri. Sanket Gupta, Advocate for the Appellant Shri. Prakash Kumar Singh, Superintendent (AR) for the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. RAMESH NAIR, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) HON'BLE MR. RAJU, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Final Order No. A/ 10015 /2023 DATE OF HEARING:22.12.2022 DATE OF DECISION:05.01.2023 RAMESH NAIR Shri. Sanket Gupta, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that in the appellant Company case the resolution plan has been approved by NCLT vide order dated 19.09.2020 and subsequently with reference to the NCLT order the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Civil Application No. 1 of 2016 in R/TAX Appeal No. 110 of 2016 vide order dated 16.12.2021 upheld the order of the NCLT.

2. Shri Prakash Kumar Singh, Learned Superintendent (Authorized Representative) appearing for the Revenue reiterates the finding of the impugned order.

3. On careful consideration of the submission made by both the sides and perusal of the records. We find that since the Company has gone into

2|Page ST/429/2012-DB liquidation and NCLT has passed the resolution plan. The proceeding in the present appeal became infructuous.

4. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as infructuous with liberty to the aggrieved person to approach this Tribunal if required by filing an appropriate application in accordance with law.

(Pronounced in the open court On 05.01.2023) (RAMESH NAIR) MEMBER (JUDICIAL) (RAJU) MEMBER (TECHNICAL) PRACHI