Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Tarsem Singh vs State Of Punjab on 22 September, 2021

Author: Anupinder Singh Grewal

Bench: Anupinder Singh Grewal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

212/2                            CRM-M-37539-2021
                                 DATE OF DECISION: 22.09.2021
TARSEM SINGH                                          ... Petitioner(s)
                           Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB                                       ... Respondent(s)

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Present:     Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate for the petitioner.

             Mr. Ramandeep Sandhu, Senior DAG, Punjab.

                 ****
ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL)

Case taken up through video conferencing.

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 122 dated 06.11.2018, under Sections 336 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, besides Section 9-B of the Explosive Act, 1884, registered at Police Station Bhindi Saidan, District Amritsar Rural.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that it is alleged that the recovery of material meant for fire crackers was allegedly effected from the courtyard of the house wherein the petitioner and other accused are residing in a joint family. The petitioner is a daily wage Beldar with the Forest Department and is not involved in any other criminal case.

This Court, by the order dated 10.09.2021, had directed the petitioner to appear before the Investigating Officer and join the investigation and in the event of his arrest, he was ordered to be released on ad-interim bail to the satisfaction of the Investigating/Arresting Officer, subject to the conditions envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Learned State counsel, upon instructions from ASI Sarabjit Singh, states that the petitioner has joined investigation.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 22-09-2021 23:20:38 ::: CRM-M-37539-2021 2 In view of the above and the petitioner having joined investigation, the order dated 10.09.2021 granting interim bail to the petitioner is made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. He shall also join investigation as and when called upon to do so.

The petition stands disposed of.




                                       (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL)
                                               JUDGE
22.09.2021
SwarnjitS
             Whether speaking/reasoned :        Yes / No
             Whether reportable        :        Yes / No




                                           2 of 2
                  ::: Downloaded on - 22-09-2021 23:20:38 :::