Kerala High Court
M/S. Craysol Technologies (India) ... vs Union Of India on 26 May, 2022
Author: Amit Rawal
Bench: Amit Rawal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
THURSDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2022 / 5TH JYAISHTA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 19749 OF 2016
PETITIONER:
M/S. CRAYSOL TECHNOLOGIES (INDIA) PVT.LTD.,
CRAYSOL BUILDING, XVIII/498, COCHIN UNIVERSITY ROAD,
CUSAT P.O., KALAMASSERY,COCHIN-682022, KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,
MR. NOBY E.A, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.I. ABI.
BY ADV SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM
RESPONDENTS:
1 UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS,
NEW DELHI -1100 001.
2 ASSOCIATION OF STATE ROAD
TRANSPORTATION UNDERTAKING(ASRTU)
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, ASRTU BHAVAN,
PLOT-4A,PSP BLOCK, POCKET-14, SECTOR-8,DWARAKA,
NEW DELHI -110077.
3 EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
ASSOCIATION OF STATE ROAD TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING (ASRTU),
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, ASRTU BHAVAN, PLOT-4A,
PSP BLOCK, POCKET-14, SECTOR-8,DWARAKA,
NEW DELHI-1100077.
4 TECHNICAL DIRECTOR
ASSOCIATION OF STATE ROAD TRANSPORT UNDERTAKING (ASRTU),
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, ASRTU BHAVAN, PLOT-4A,
PSP BLOCK, POCKET-14, SECTOR-8, DWARAKA,
NEW DELHI-1100077.
5 KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION (KSRTC)
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR,TRANSPORT BHAVAN,
TRIVANDRUM-695001.
WP(C) NO. 19749 OF 2016
2
6 MS. AUTOGRADE INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED,
35/334, MAMANGALAM CHURH ROAD,MANGALAM-682025,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
7 MS. ROSMERTA AUTOTECH
PRIVATE LIMITED, KHASRA NO. 9/28, KAPASHERA,
NEW DELHI -110038,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BY ADVS.
SRI.BABU P.L., CGC
SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON
SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI
SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON
SRI.RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN
SRI.P.SANJAY
SRI.S.MANU - ASGI
SRI.DEEPY THANKAN - SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 26.05.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 19749 OF 2016
3
JUDGMENT
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL JUDGE nak