22. When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant.
Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question.22-A. When oral admission as to contents of electronic records are relevant Oral admissions as to the contents of electronic records are not relevant, unless the genuineness of the electronic record produced is in question.[Inserted by Act 21 of 2000, Section 92 and Sch.II (w.e.f. 17.10.2000).]
