Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Debasish Roy vs The High Court At Calcutta on 10 September, 2018

Bench: Ranjan Gogoi, Navin Sinha, K.M. Joseph

                                                          1

     ITEM NO.24                              COURT NO.2                            SECTION PIL-W

                                 S U P R E M E C O U R T O F                   I N D I A
                                         RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                             Writ Petition(s)(Civil)            No(s).     1032/2018

     DEBASISH ROY                                                                   Petitioner(s)

                                                         VERSUS

     THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA & ANR.                                              Respondent(s)

     (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.123536/2018-STAY APPLICATION)

     Date : 10-09-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN GOGOI
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

     For Petitioner(s)                Mr.   Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv.
                                      Mr.   Kushagra Pandey, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Prasenjit Keswani, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Kabir Shankar Bose, Adv.
                                      Mr.   Abhimanue Shrestha, AOR

     For Respondent(s)

                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

It is, inter alia, contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that inviting applications for designation of senior advocate(s) from advocate(s) practicing in the High Court(s) alone is contrary to the directions passed in Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India & Ors.1 Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Without going into the said or any other NEETU KHAJURIA Date: 2018.09.10 17:00:12 IST Reason: contention raised we are of the view that the petitioner should approach the High Court on the 1 (2017) 9 SCC 766 2 judicial side in the first instance. We, therefore, permit the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition and instead move the High Court.

The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms.

 (NEETU KHAJURIA)                            (ASHA SONI)
   COURT MASTER                          ASSISTANT REGISTRAR