Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Gauhati High Court

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Mostan Ali@Mastan Ali@ Mastak Ali And ... on 16 June, 2023

                                                                   Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010245992022




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3558/2022

            NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
            HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT 3, MIDDLETON
            STREET, KOLKATA, AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GS ROAD,
            BHANGAGARH, GUWAHATI



            VERSUS

            MOSTAN ALI@MASTAN ALI@ MASTAK ALI AND ANR. B
            S/O MONUHAR ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LALARCHAK, PS AND DIST
            KARIMGANJ, ASSAM 788722

            2:MORTUJA HUSSAIN
             S/O LATE SAMSUL HOQUE

            RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIZNATHUPUR
            PS AND DIST KARIMGANJ
            ASSAM 78871

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR. R GOSWAMI

Advocate for the Respondent :



             Linked Case : MFA/103/2022

            NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
            HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT 3
            MIDDLETON STREET
            KOLKATA
            AND ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT GS ROAD
            BHANGAGARH
                                                                        Page No.# 2/3

             GUWAHATI


             VERSUS

             MOSTAN ALI@MASTAN ALI@ MASTAK ALI AND ANR.
             S/O MONUHAR ALI

             RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LALARCHAK
             PS AND DIST KARIMGANJ
             ASSAM 788722

             2:MORTUJA HUSSAIN
             S/O LATE SAMSUL HOQUE

             RESIDENT OF VILLAGE NIZNATHUPUR
             PS AND DIST KARIMGANJ
             ASSAM 788713
             ------------
             Advocate for : MR. R GOSWAMI
             Advocate for : appearing for MOSTAN ALI@MASTAN ALI@ MASTAK ALI AND
             ANR.



                                  BEFORE
                   HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA
                                   ORDER

16.06.2023 Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the appellant.

This appeal, under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923, is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 05.08.2022, passed by the learned Labour Officer Cum Commissioner, for Employee's Compensation, Karimganj, in E.C. Case No. 01/2021.

Upon hearing the learned counsel for the appellant, this appeal is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:-

Page No.# 3/3
1) Whether in the given facts where the claimant has not suffered amputation, does the finding of the learned Commissioner of the employees Compensation that the left leg of the claimant has been amputated suffered from perversity, which gives rise to a substantial question of law?
2) Whether in the given facts where the claimant has not suffered amputation does the learned Commissioner has the jurisdiction to assess compensation under Part I of Schedule I of the Act by presuming 100% loss of earning capacity?

The Court may also hear this appeal on any other substantial questions of law after notice to the parties.

Issue notice to the respondent, returnable within 4 (four) weeks.

The learned counsel for the appellant shall take steps for service of notice upon respondents by registered post with A/D as well as by usual process within a week from today.

List the matter after Summer vacation.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant