Kerala High Court
Sivakumar vs The Authorised & Chief Manager ... on 19 January, 2015
Author: A.M.Shaffique
Bench: A.M.Shaffique
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE 2016/20TH JYAISHTA, 1938
WP(C).No. 19070 of 2016 (G)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
-------------
SIVAKUMAR,AGED 50 YEARS,
S/O SWAMY ACHARY, MURUGA BHAVAN,
PALLITHOTTAM, KOLLAM-691303.
BY ADV. SRI.THYPARAMBIL THOMAS THOMAS
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
THE AUTHORISED & CHIEF MANAGER SYNDICATE BANK
REGIONAL OFFICE, HOSPITAL ROAD, SASTHAMANGALAM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695010.
BY SRI.R.S. KALKURA, SC, SYNDICATE BANK
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 10-06-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME
DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 19070 of 2016 (G)
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-----------------------
EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE PASSBOOK IN LOAN A/C
NO.45001550000539 OF THE PETITIONER FROM
JANUARY, 199 TO 16 SEPTEMBER, 2015.
EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED UNDER SECTION
13(2) OF SARFAESI ACT.
EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE DATED
19.1.2015 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK.
EXHIBIT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 5.8.2015 IN CMP
NO.2336/15 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,
KOLLAM.
EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE ADVOCATE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE
PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT DATED 14.1.2016.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
************
W.P.C.No.19070 of 2016
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 10th day of June 2016
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court being faced with proceedings under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act.
2. The main contention urged by the petitioner is that no such petition could have been filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 14 of the Act as the claim itself was barred by limitation. If the petitioner has a contention that the claim is barred by limitation, his remedy is to challenge the proceedings under Section 17 of the Act. This Court cannot adjudicate on such issues which have been projected by the petitioner.
Hence this writ petition is dismissed.
(sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) jsr