Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Manahavala Perumal vs State Of Tamilnadu on 27 July, 2015

Author: M.Venugopal

Bench: Satish K. Agnihotri, M.Venugopal

        

 
		 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras

Dated:  27.07.2015

Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI 
and
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.VENUGOPAL

W.A.No.1028 of 2015 and 
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015


R.Manahavala Perumal 				..Appellant/Petitioner

						Vs.

1. State of Tamilnadu
    Rep. By its Secretary,
    Municipal Administration and 
      Water Supply Department,
    Fort St. George, Chennai  600 009

2. The Director of Municipal Administration
    Ezhilagam Annexe Building
     Chepauk, Chennai  600 005

3. The Commissioner
     Tirunelveli City Municipal 
           Corporation, Tirunelveli. 	       ..Respondents / Respondents


Prayer:  Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letter Patent Appeal to set aside the Order dated 05.06.2015 made in W.P.No.370 of 2015 and M.P.No.3 of 2015 in W.P.No.16323 of 2015 dated 10.06.2015.

		For Appellant	:	Mr.T.T.Ravichandran

		For Respondents	:	Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugasundaram
						Special Government Pleader


JUDGMENT 

[Judgment of the Court was Delivered By M.VENUGOPAL, J.] The Appellant / Petitioner has preferred the present instant Writ Appeal as against the Order dated 10.06.2015 in M.P.No.3 of 2015 in W.P.No.16323 of 2015 passed by the Learned Single Judge in dismissing the Petition.

2. It is not in dispute that the Appellant/Petitioner as an Assistant was employed in the 3rd Respondent/Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation. Also, that he was sent on Deputation to the 2nd Respondent/Office of the Director of Municipal Administration, Chennai  5, to the post of 'System Analyst', after lapse of Deputation period, the Appellant was to the parent Department. In fact, this Court had dismissed the Writ Appeal No.1027 of 2015 filed by the Appellant as against the Order dated 05.06.2015 in W.P.No.370 of 2015 passed by the Learned Single Judge.

3. In the instant case, the Appellant was recruited to the post of 'System Analyst' in the office of the 2nd Respondent through appointment by means of Deputation. Further, the Appellant cannot seek absorption in the 2nd Respondent's office as 'System Analyst' either as a matter of right or routine. Moreover when this Court had dismissed the Writ Appeal No.1027 of 2015 filed by the Appellant/Petitioner as against the Order dated 05.06.2015 in W.P.No.370 of 2015 passed by the Learned Single Judge, this Court is of the considered view that the Appellant / Petitioner is not entitled to seek relief of Stay of the Operation of the Order passed by the 1st Respondent in Letter No.(2D) No.8 dated 02.02.2015 in M.P.No.3 of 2015 pending disposal of the W.P.No.16323 of 2015.

Viewed in that perspective, the Writ Appeal fails. In the result, the Writ Appeal is dismissed leaving the parties to bear their own costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

						[S.K.A., J.]       [M.V., J.]
								  
							   27.07.2015

Index:Yes/No;Internet:Yes/No.
ssd

SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI, J.
and
M.VENUGOPAL,  J.
ssd
To



1. State of Tamilnadu
    Rep. By its Secretary,
    Muncipal Administration and 
      Water Supply Department,
    Fort St. George, Chennai  600 009

2. The Director of Municipal Administration
    Ezhilagam Annexe Building
     Chepauk, Chennai  600 005

3. The Commissioner
     Tirunelveli City Municipal 
           Corporation,  Tirunelveli. 			

W.A.No.1028 of 2015 and 
M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015


27.07.2015