Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Thomas George Muthoot vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ...

Author: P.R. Ramachandra Menon

Bench: P.R.Ramachandra Menon

       

  

  

 
 
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                              PRESENT:

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

               MONDAY,THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2014/26TH PHALGUNA, 1935

                                  WP(C).No. 5808 of 2014 (A)
                                  ---------------------------------------

PETITIONER:
-------------------

            THOMAS GEORGE MUTHOOT,
            MUTHOOT HOUSE, KOZHENCHERRY,
            PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 689 641.

            BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.)
                        SRI.M.B.PRAJITH
                        SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN
                        SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN

RESPONDENTS:
------------------------

          1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
             CIRCLE-1, ENNIKKATTIL ESTATE,
             NEAR K.S.R.T.C BUS STATION, THIRUVALLA - 689 648.

          2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
             (APPEALS), AYAKKAR BHAVAN, KAWDIAR,
             THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.

          3. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR,
             INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, COCHIN BENCH, 1ST FLOOR,
             (BLOCK C-1 & C-II), KENDIRYA BHAVAN, OPP.CSEZ,
             KAKKANAD, COCHIN - 682 037.

             BY SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON,SR.COUNSEL, GOI(TAXES)
                  SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
          ON 17-03-2014, ALONG WITH WPC. 5819/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME
          DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 5808 of 2014 (A)
--------------------------------------

                                                APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1:                    TRUE COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER AND DEMAND NOTICE
                               DATED 27.12.2011 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07
                               PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P1(A):                 TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08
                               PASSED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2:                    TRUE COPY OF COMMON ORDER DATED 13.01.2014 OF THE
                               2ND RESPONDENT IN ITA NOS.34 AND 35/TVLA/11-12 FOR THE
                               ASST.YEARS 2006-07 AND 2007-08.

EXHIBIT P3:                    TRUE COPY OF MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL FOR THE
                               ASST.YEAR 2006-07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE
                               THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3(A):                 TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08
                                SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD
                                RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P4:                    TRUE COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 24.02.2012 FOR THE
                               ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER
                               BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT WITHOUT ANNEXURES.

EXHIBIT P4(A):                 TRUE COPY OF -DO- FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08
                               SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD
                               RESPONDENT WITHOUT ANNEXURES.

EXHIBIT P5:                    TRUE COPY OF SHOW CAUSE NOTICE DATED 21.02.2014
                               ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES
----------------------------------------------

ANNEXURE R1(A):                DETAILS OF DEMAND RAISED FOR VARIOUS ASSESSMENT.

ANNEXURE R1(B):                DETAILS OF DEMAND RAISED FOR VARIOUS ASSESSMENT.


                                                         //TRUE COPY//


                                                         P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.



                  P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.
                 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       W.P.(C) Nos. 5808 and
                             5819 of 2014
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
               Dated, this the 17th day of March, 2014

                              JUDGMENT

Being aggrieved of Exts. P1 series assessment orders passed by the first respondent for different assessment years, though the petitioners approached the first appellate authority by availing statutory remedy, same did not turn to be fruitful, as borne by Ext. P2 common order passed on 13.01.2014. Met with the situation, the petitioners have approached third respondent by filing Exts. P3 series appeals along with I.A. for stay vide Exts .P4 series. The petitioners are constrained to approach this Court because of the coercive proceedings pursued in the meanwhile, more so when, there was no regular sitting by the 3rd respondent.

2. Heard Sri. T.M. Sreedhran, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri. P.K. Raveendranatha Menon, the learned Senior Standing counsel appearing for the Income Tax Department

3. During the course of hearing, the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that, in respect of the W.P.(C) No. 5808 and 5819 of 2014 : 2 : assessment years in question pertaining to W.P.(C) No. 5808 of 2014, the petitioner has already satisfied 39 % of the disputed liability , while in respect of assessment years pertain to W.P.(C) No. 5819 of 2014, the petitioner has satisfied 45 % of the disputed liability.

4. After hearing both the sides, the writ petitions are disposed of, directing the petitioners to satisfy 1/3rd of the outstanding liability as on date, by effecting same by way two equal monthly installments and furnish security for the balance amount. The first installment shall be effected on or before the last working day of March, 2014; followed by the next installment to be effected on before the last working day of April 2014. Subject to this, recovery proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. The third respondent is directed to pass final orders on Ext. P3 series appeals, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

Sd/-

P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, (JUDGE) kmd