Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Smt. Mudita Bhardwaj vs State Of H.P. With All Consequential on 18 July, 2022

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Chander Bhusan Barowalia

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
              ON THE 18th DAY OF JULY, 2022
                        BEFORE
         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN




                                                        .
                           &





     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
         CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 4773 OF 2022





    Between:­
    1. SMT. MUDITA BHARDWAJ, W/O
    SH.   LEKH    RAJ  BHARDWAJ,
    RIDVITI COTTAGE, NEAR SUKHI
    BAWARI          KAMALANAGAR,





    SANJAULI DISTRICT SHIMLA, H.P.
    AGED     ABOUT    46    YEARS,
    PRESENTLY       POSTED      AS
    LECTURER (PSYCHOLOGY) GOVT.

    BOYS SR. SECONDARY SCHOOL

    SANJAULI,   DISTRICT   SHIMLA,
    H.P.

    2. SH. KUSHAL CHAND, S/O SH.
    MEHAR CHAND, R/O VILLAGE



    BADHAL, DISTRICT SHIMLA, H.P.
    AGED    ABOUT     54   YEARS,
    PRESENTLY       POSTED     AS




    LECTURER     (COMMERCE)    AT
    GOVERNMENT BOYS SR. SEC.





    SCHOOL     JUBBAL,   DISTRICT
    SHIMLA, H.P.

    3. SH. KIRTI SINGH SISODIA, S/O





    SH.   YASHPAL    SISODIA,   R/O
    VILLAGE      BHARANOO,      P.O.
    BHARANOO,      TEHSIL    NERWA,
    DISTRICT SHIMLA, H.P. AGED
    ABOUT 50 YEARS, PRESENTLY
    POSTED AS LECTURER (HISTORY)
    AT    GOVERNMENT      SR.  SEC.
    SCHOOL    THAROCH,     DISTRICT
    SHIMLA, H.P.

                                              ......PETITIONERS
    (BY MR. MUKUL SOOD, ADVOCATE)




                                       ::: Downloaded on - 18/07/2022 20:03:03 :::CIS
                                        2




    AND


    1. STATE OF H.P. THROUGH




                                                                 .
    SECRETARY (EDUCATION) TO THE





    GOVERNMENT OF H.P. SHIMLA­
    171002.
    2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER





    EDUCATION TO THE GOVT. OF
    HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA­1.


                                                    .....RESPONDENTS





    (BY  MR.   ASHOK   SHARMA,
    ADVOCATE GENERAL WITH MR.
    VINOD THAKUR, MR. SHIV PAL
    MANHANS,         ADDITIONAL
    ADVOCATES

                 GENERAL,   MR.
    YUDHVIR SINGH THAKUR AND

    MR.    BHUPINDER    THAKUR,
    DEPUTY ADVOCATES GENERAL
    AND MR. RAJAT CHAUHAN, LAW
    OFFICER)



                 This petition coming on for admission before notice
    this day, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, passed




    the following:





                                      ORDER

Issue notice. Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents­State.

2. The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following substantive reliefs:­ "(a) Writ in nature of mandamus may be issued directing the respondent to regularize the services of the petitioners immediately on completion of 8 years' service on contract basis along with all consequential benefits, including arrears of pay along with interest @ 12% per annum.

::: Downloaded on - 18/07/2022 20:03:03 :::CIS 3

(b) Writ in the nature of mandamus further directing the respondent to extend the same & similar benefits to the petitioners on completion of eight years of service, as has been granted to petitioner in CWP No. 1853/2009 titled as .

Arpana Bali Versus State of H.P. with all consequential benefits, including subsequent revisions with 12% interest on the accrued amount along with entire arrears.

(c) That petitioner may also be granted same and similar treatment which has been given to similar situated teacher by respondent No. 2, vide its order dated 28­11­2019 or in alternate the benefits of order dated 28­11­2019 may also be extended to petitioners, with all consequential benefits"

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the issue in question is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court rendered in CWP No.1853 of 2009 titled as Arpana Bali vs. The State of Himachal Pradesh and others, decided on 10.4.2013. This is a matter which is required to be seen and gone into by the employer/respondents.

4. Therefore, in the facts and circumstances of the case, we dispose of this writ petition directing the respondents to consider and decide the case of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid decision and in case it is found to be covered by the said judgment, then the same and similar benefits as extended to the petitioner in CWP No.1853 of 2009, be also extended to the petitioners. This entire exercise shall be completed within three months. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

::: Downloaded on - 18/07/2022 20:03:03 :::CIS 4

For compliance to come up on 18.10.2022.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) .

Judge (Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 18th July, 2022 (raman) r to ::: Downloaded on - 18/07/2022 20:03:03 :::CIS