Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Spicejet Ltd vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 15 February, 2019

Author: Mukta Gupta

Bench: Mukta Gupta

$~25,27&29
*     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+    W.P.(CRL) 494/2019
     SPICEJET LTD.                                ..... Petitioner
               Represented by:   Mr. Varun K. chopra, Mr. Gurtejpal
                                 Singh, Advs.
                      versus

     STATE OF NCT OF DELHI                          ..... Respondent
              Represented by:    Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel
                                 with Mr. Chaitanya, Mr. Amanpreet
                                 Singh, Advs. with Insp. Manish Joshi,
                                 SI Vikam Singh PS Greater Kailash.

+    W.P.(CRL) 499/2019
     KIRAN KUMAR KOTESHWAR                    ..... Petitioner
             Represented by: Mr. Varun K. chopra, Mr. Gurtejpal
                             Singh, Advs.

                      versus

     STATE OF NCT OF DELHI                          ..... Respondent
              Represented by:    Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel
                                 with Mr. Chaitanya, Mr. Amanpreet
                                 Singh, Advs. with Insp. Manish Joshi,
                                 SI Vikam Singh PS Greater Kailash.

+    W.P.(CRL) 502/2019
     CHANDAN SAND                                 ..... Petitioner
             Represented by:     Mr. Varun K. chopra, Mr. Gurtejpal
                                 Singh, Advs.

                      versus

W.P.(CRL) Nos. 494/2019, 499/2019 & 502/2019             page 1 of 2
       STATE OF NCT OF DELHI                              ..... Respondent
               Represented by:        Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel
                                      with Mr. Chaitanya, Mr. Amanpreet
                                      Singh, Advs. with Insp. Manish Joshi,
                                      SI Vikam Singh PS Greater Kailash.
      CORAM:
      HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
                       ORDER

% 15.02.2019 Crl.M.As. 3440-3441/2019 in W.P.(CRL) 494/2019 Crl.M.As. 3461-3462/2019 in W.P.(CRL) 499/2019 Crl.M.As. 3488-3489/2019 in W.P.(CRL) 502/2019 Exemptions allowed subject to just exceptions. W.P.(CRL) 494/2019 & Crl.M.A. 3439/2019 (stay) W.P.(CRL) 499/2019 & Crl.M.A. 3460/2019 (stay) W.P.(CRL) 502/2019 & Crl.M.A. 3487/2019 (stay) Notice. Learned Standing Counsel for the State accepts notice. Since the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR in question the complainant is required to be impleaded as a party respondent. On the oral prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, the complainant Puneet Dewan is permitted to be impleaed as respondent No.2. Amended memo of parties be filed within two days.

On the amended memo of parties being filed, issue notice to the newly added respondent No.2 on the petitioner taking steps through ordinary and dasti process, registered AD and speed post returnable on 7th May, 2019.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 15, 2019 'ga' W.P.(CRL) Nos. 494/2019, 499/2019 & 502/2019 page 2 of 2