Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Smtsusheela Kumari vs Gnctd on 22 January, 2015

                   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
                      (Room No.315, B­Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi 110 066)



                     Prof. M. Sridhar Acharyulu (Madabhushi Sridhar)

                                             Information Commissioner




                                             CIC/SA/A/2014/000737

    Ms. Sushila Kumari v. Sant Nirankari Girls Senior Secondary School, Delhi

                                             Important Dates and time taken:




     RTI:  16.9.2013                       Reply: 30.10.2013                         Time: 

     FAA:22.11.2013                        FAO: ­­­­                                 Time: 

     SA: 19.2.2014                         Hearing:15.01.2015                        Decision:22.01.2015

     Show cause

     Compliance

     Result:                   Rejected




Parties Present:


The Respondent Authority was represented by Mrs. R. Kaur, Principal with Mr. R.K. Sharma, Sant 

Nirankari School, Delhi and the Applicant was absent.


Information sought

:

1. Appellant through his RTI application sought to know as to what post was held by the  Chairman of Sant Nirankari Kanya Sr Sec School before being appointed toas a chairman; 

detail   of   the   member   of   Staff   Selection   Committee   who   were   constituted   pursuant   to  advertisement dated 17.06.2011 etc CPIO Response:

2. CPIO gave para wise reply.

Ground for First Appeal:

3. Residential address of the member of the SSC members not provided.

First Appellate Authority Order:

4. FAA ordered that residential address of the members cannot be furnished in view of the  CIC Orders. However, it is put to record that the Official address of all the members were  provided. 

Ground For Second Appeal :

5. Unsatisfactory reply.

Proceedings Before the Commission:

6. The Commission having heard the submission and on perusal of file, find that there is no  merit  in  the case and  there is  no  reason to  interfere  with the  First  Appellate Authority  order. 

Hence, appeal is rejected.

Sd/­  (M Sridhar Acharyulu) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy (Bablu Lal) Deputy Registrar Address of parties

1. The CPIO under the RTI Act,  Sant Nirankari Girls Sr. Sec. School Govt. of NCT of Delhi Sant Nirankari Colony Delhi­110 009

2. Ms. Sushila Kumari 8/8, Nakul Gali, Vishwas Nagar Shahdara Delhi­110032