Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Orissa High Court

Jemamani Pasayat & Others vs Nirupama Behera & Others .... Opposite ... on 6 September, 2022

Author: Savitri Ratho

Bench: Savitri Ratho

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                               TRP(C) No. 222 of 2022
            Jemamani Pasayat & Others         ....              Petitioners
                                         Mr. Jagabandhu Sahu, Advocate
                                      Versus
            Nirupama Behera & Others          ....        Opposite Parties

                CORAM:
                          JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
                                           ORDER
Order No.                                 06.09.2022
  02.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Office note indicates that neither A.D. nor undelivered notice as against opposite party no.3 is back and postal tracking report confirming service of notice on opposite party no.3, is at Flag A.

3. Unfortunately, though the dealing assistant has indicated that the A.D. as against opposite party nos.1, 2 & 4 is back after valid service, the same has not indicated in the cause list by the listing assistant for reasons best known to him.

4. The Superintendent, Listing Section is directed to call for an explanation from the concerned person for such lapse.

5. In order to give another chance to the opposite party nos.1 to 4, list this matter on 15.09.2022. Office is directed to verify if any counsel has appeared on behalf of the opposite party nos.1 to 4 and indicate the names of the counsel in the brief as well as in the cause list.

.........................

(Savitri Ratho) Judge puspa