Himachal Pradesh High Court
Bulesh Kumar Sharma vs Union Of India on 24 November, 2021
Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Satyen Vaidya
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
ON THE 24th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021
BEFORE
.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
&
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATYEN VAIDYA
CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 5118 OF 2021
Between:-
BULESH KUMAR SHARMA
(INDOS NO. 00NL8761) AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
S/O SH. MED RAM SHARMA,
R/O VILLAGE BHATWARI PO KOT KHAMRADHA
TEHSIL AUT, DISTRICT MANDI, HP.
r ....PETITIONER
(BY MR. JAI RAM SHARMA, ADVOCATE)
AND
1. UNION OF INDIA
THROUGH NAUTICAL ADVISOR,
MERCANTILE MARINE DEPARTMENT
TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.
2. PRINCIPAL OFFICER,
MERCANTILE MARINE DEPARTMENT
MUMBAI, GOVT. OF INDIA.
..RESPONDENTS
(MR. VIR BAHADUR VERMA, CGC)
________________________________________________________________________
This petition coming on for orders this day, Hon'ble Mr. Justice
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, passed the following:
ORDER
The instant petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief:-
"i) That the respondents may very kindly be directed to issued certificate of training (1st Mate) 1st Mate and grant the appointment/promotion as Chief Office to petitioner with all consequential benefits, in the interest of justice."::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:19:27 :::CIS 2
2. The perusal of the petition would go to show that the petitioner, at the first instance, has not taken up the matter with .
the respondent Department. In such circumstances, it will be appropriate for this Court to issue a writ of mandamus.
3. Heard. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, the respondents are directed to consider the instant petition as a representation and take a decision within eight weeks from today.
4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)
r Judge
November 24, 2021 ( Satyen Vaidya )
(naveen) Judge
::: Downloaded on - 31/01/2022 23:19:27 :::CIS