Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court

Ipex Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd vs Krishna Constructions & Ors on 27 January, 2026

                          $~59
                          *      IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                                                                     Date of decision: 27.01.2026
                          +      O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 492/2025, I.A. 525/2026 (For issuance of
                                 Necessary Directions) & I.A. 2218/2026 (For Dir.)

                                 IPEX INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.                         .....Petitioner
                                                        Through:   Mr. Varun Chandiok, Mr.
                                                                   Pardeep Dhingra and Mr.
                                                                   Nishant Kumar, Advocates.
                                                        versus

                                 KRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS & ORS.                       .....Respondents
                                                        Through:   Mr. Abhishek Malhotra, Senior
                                                                   Advocate along with Mr.
                                                                   Kartikay Dutta and Ms.
                                                                   Anukriti Trivedi, Advocates for
                                                                   R-1 to R-3.
                                                                   Ms. Parul Gurudev and
                                                                   Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocates
                                                                   for R-4.
                                                                   Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Mr. Rishabh
                                                                   Yadav and Mr. Harsh Chauhan,
                                                                   Advocates for Applicant in I.A.
                                                                   2218/2026.
                                 CORAM:
                                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN
                                 SHANKAR

                          %                            J U D G E M E N T (Oral)

                          1.     The present petition filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and
                          Conciliation Act, 1996, ["the Act"] relates to a Memorandum of
                          Understanding dated 03.11.2025 ["MoU"] and the disputes which
                          have arisen in respect thereof, seeking interim orders.
                          2.     Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:HARVINDER KAUR
                          O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 492/2025                                      Page 1 of 3
BHATIA
Signing Date:29.01.2026
16:08:06
                           instead of adjudication of this petition on merit by this Court, the
                          present lis be referred to arbitration, and till the time the learned
                          Arbitrator(s) enter into reference, the arrangement as of today may be
                          continued.
                          3.     This Court finds that the suggestions made by the parties are
                          reasonable and appropriate.
                          4.     Since the learned counsel for the parties are ad idem, and the
                          dispute between the parties is the subject matter of an Arbitration
                          clause, being Clause 14 of the MoU, the parties herein waive their
                          right to issue notice under Section 21 of the Act and to file a Petition
                          under Section 11 of the Act.
                          5.     For the sake of convenience, the Arbitration clause being
                          Clause 14 of the MoU, is reproduced hereunder:
                                 "14. Dispute if any shall be resolved through Arbitration by the
                                 parties."

                          6.     In view of the foregoing, the disputes as arisen between the
                          parties, are referred to the Arbitration.
                          7.     Accordingly, Ms. Vibha Mahajan Seth, learned Senior
                          Advocate (e-mail : [email protected] & Mobile No.
                          9810702410), who is empanelled with the DIAC, is appointed as the
                          sole Arbitrator.
                          8.     The arbitration would take place under the aegis of the Delhi
                          International Arbitration Centre ["DIAC"] and would abide by its
                          rules and regulations. The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees
                          as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
                          9.     The learned Arbitrator is also requested to file the requisite
                          disclosure under Section 12 (2) of the Act within a week of entering of


Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:HARVINDER KAUR
                          O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 492/2025                                        Page 2 of 3
BHATIA
Signing Date:29.01.2026
16:08:06
                           reference.
                          10.     The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to the
                          learned arbitrator through all permissible modes, including through e-
                          mail.
                          11.     All rights and contentions of the parties in relation to the
                          claims/counter-claims are kept open, to be decided by the learned
                          Arbitrator on their merits, in accordance with law.
                          12.     Needless to say, nothing in this order shall be construed as an
                          expression of opinion of this Court on the merits of the controversy
                          between the parties.
                          13.     Accordingly, the present petition under Section 9 of the Act be
                          treated as an application under Section 17 of the Act, and appropriate
                          directions may be passed by the learned Arbitrator after entering
                          reference.
                          14.     The applications filed on behalf of the Indian Medical
                          Association may also be transferred to the learned Arbitrator for
                          consideration.
                          15.     The present interim order will continue to operate till the time
                          the learned Arbitrator adjudicates the application under Section 17 of
                          the Act.
                          16.     Accordingly,         the   present   petition   along   with      pending
                          applications, if any, stands disposed of.




                                            HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

JANUARY 27, 2026/tk/her/jk Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARVINDER KAUR O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 492/2025 Page 3 of 3 BHATIA Signing Date:29.01.2026 16:08:06