Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Chail Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 4 July, 2023

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2023:RJ-JD:19378]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                     S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 203/2023

Chail Singh S/o Sh. Uk Singh, Aged About 42 Years, Amba Ka
Goliya, Jhab Police Station, The Then/presently Manager Of
Saraswati Vidhya Mandir, Surana, Sayla, Police Station, Teh.
Sayla, Dist. Jalore.
                                                                       ----Appellant
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Kishore Kumar S/o Pola Ram, B/c Meghwal, R/o Surana,
         Sayla Police Station, Dist. Jalore.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)              :    Mr. J.V.S. Deora
For Respondent(s)             :    Mr. A.R. Choudhary, PP
                                   Mr. Anil Bidan Halu
                                   Mr. L.K. Ramdhari



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

                                        Order

JUDGMENT RESERVED ON                            :::                 24/05/2023
JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON                          :::                 04/07/2023

BY THE COURT:-

1. By way of filing the instant Criminal Appeal, challenge has been challenge has been made to the order dated 04.02.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act (Prevention of Atrocities), Jalore in Sessions Case No.71/2022 whereby learned trial Judge has directed to frame charges against the appellant for the offences under Section 302 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) and Section 75, 82(1) of the Juvenile Justice Act.

(Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 01:54:56 AM) [2023:RJ-JD:19378] (2 of 4) [CRLAS-203/2023]

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 13.08.2022, Kishore Kumar submitted a written report to the SHO concerned alleging therein that his nephew Indra Kumar who was studying in Class III, in Sarswati Vidhya Mandir and Chail Singh was posted as teacher therein. It is alleged that Chail Singh used to arrange two flasks of water pots among which, one was exclusively meant for use by the person of the upper class of society and another for the use of downtrodden class of the society and for the people of SC/ST persons. On 20.07.2022, upon crave of thrust, his nephew Indra Kumar erroneously used the pot for drinking water which was being used by the people of upper class of society, upon which Chail Singh irked by his act and started to gave beatings to him. It is further submitted that his nephew was also humiliated and intimidated by the appellant on account of his caste as he belongs to Scheduled Caste community. It is alleged that as a consequence of the injury inflicted to boy Indra Kumar, he died on 13.08.2022. There are allegations that injury inflicted to Indra Kumar by Chail Singh was responsible for the death of his nephew. On the basis of the said written report FIR No.155/2022 was registered at the Police Station Sayala, District Jalore for the offences under Section 302 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) and Section 75, 82(1) of the Juvenile Justice Act and investigation commenced.

3. After investigation and from the evidence collected by the agency, prima facie an offence under Section 302 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Act) and Section 75, 82(1) of the Juvenile Justice Act was found proved against the and the charge sheet for the above mentioned (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 01:54:56 AM) [2023:RJ-JD:19378] (3 of 4) [CRLAS-203/2023] offences came to be submitted before the Special Court. Thereafter, taking cognizance of the offences, the learned Special Judge, heard the parties on the issue of farming of charges. It seems that due weightage was given to the accused and his submissions were considered by the trial Judge and thus vide order dated 04.02.2023, while assuming it a fit case for trial, the learned trial Court directed to frame charges against the appellant, which is under assail before this Court.

4. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the order impugned and the record of the case which was summoned by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 16.02.2023.

5. After hearing the counsel for the parties and perusing the record, this Court is of the firm opinion that the learned trial Judge has prudently appreciated the legal and factual aspects of the matter and then form an opinion that there are reasonable grounds to presume that the accused committed the offence as alleged and, therefore, he is required to be tried. There is sufficient direct or indirect evidence levelling allegation of beating by the accused, as a necessary consequence of which, the deceased Indra Kumar had sustained thrombus in the throat and ocular veins.

6. The statement of Dr. Harshad Sutariya is also on record besides treatment record and postmortem report of Indra Kumar , during the course of investigation, a pen drive containing audio/video clip in which allegedly the appellant seems to making a confession regarding the fact that he slapped the deceased on his right eye or ear. It is nigh well settled that at the stage of (Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 01:54:56 AM) [2023:RJ-JD:19378] (4 of 4) [CRLAS-203/2023] hearing on the point of charge, meticulous appreciation of evidence is required to be done and a prima facie case has to be seen so as to presume that the accused has committed the offence.

7. After going through the material available on record and perusing the order impugned, I am of this firm opinion that ample evidence is available on record on the basis of which, the learned trial Judge has rightly form an opinion regarding framing of charge in which no interference is called for by this Court. Since no illegality or incorrectness has been pointed by the appellant, therefore, the appeal deserves to be dismissed.

8. Accordingly, the criminal appeal having no force is hereby dismissed. All pending applications, if any, are stand disposed of.

9. Record be sent back forthwith a direction to the learned trial Court to expedite the trial.

(FARJAND ALI),J 1-Mamta/-

(Downloaded on 12/11/2023 at 01:54:56 AM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)