Gujarat High Court
Mohit Minerals Pvt Ltd vs Union Of India & on 9 February, 2018
Author: Akil Kureshi
Bench: Akil Kureshi, B.N. Karia
C/SCA/726/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT
AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 726 of 2018
==============================================================
MOHIT MINERALS PVT LTD....Petitioner(s)
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & 1....Respondent(s)
==============================================================
Appearance :
Mr JK MITTAL for Mr HARDIK P MODH, Advocates for the Petitioner
==============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL
KURESHI
and
HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
9th February 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
The petitioner has challenged vires of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax [Rate] dated 28th June 2017 and Entry 10 of the Notification No. 10/2017-Integrated Tax [Rate] also dated 28th June 2017. The petitioner is an importer of non-cooking coal and on such imports, the petitioner pays Custom duty, the value of which includes Ocean Freight. On the same valuation, the petitioner also pays tax under the Integrated Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 ["IGST Act" for short]. The Page 1 of 3 HC-NIC Page 1 of 3 Created On Fri Feb 09 23:07:27 IST 2018 C/SCA/726/2018 ORDER petitioner's grievance is that under the impugned Notifications, the petitioner is asked to pay tax at the prescribed rate all over again on the ocean freight. The petitioner's challenge has principally three elements viz., [a] having paid the tax under IGST Act on the entire value of imports; inclusive of the ocean freight, the petitioner cannot be asked to pay tax on the ocean freight all over again under a different notification; [b] in case of CIF contracts, the service provider and service recipient both are outside the territory of India. No tax on such service can be collected even on reverse charge mechanism, and [c] in case of High Sea sales, the burden is cast on the petitioner as an importer whereas, the petitioner is not the recipient of the service at all. It is the petitioner's seller of goods on high sea basis who has received the services from the exporter/ transporter.
Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned Notifications are ultra vires the Act and are in any case in exercise of excessive delegation of Page 2 of 3 HC-NIC Page 2 of 3 Created On Fri Feb 09 23:07:27 IST 2018 C/SCA/726/2018 ORDER powers of subordinate legislation.
Notice and notice as to interim relief, returnable on 9th March 2018.
Direct service is permitted.
[AKIL KURESHI, J.] [B.N. KARIA, J.] Prakash Page 3 of 3 HC-NIC Page 3 of 3 Created On Fri Feb 09 23:07:27 IST 2018