Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Esma vs Saurashtra on 6 May, 2010

Author: M.R. Shah

Bench: M.R. Shah

   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

COMP/62/1986	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

COMPANY
PETITION No. 62 of 1986
 

With


 

COMPANY
APPLICATION No. 57 of 1986
 

In
COMPANY PETITION No. 62 of 1986
 

With


 

COMPANY
APPLICATION No. 86 of 1986
 

In
COMPANY PETITION No. 62 of 1986
 

With


 

COMPANY
APPLICATION No. 4 of 1992
 

In
COMPANY PETITION No. 62 of 1986
 

With


 

COMPANY
APPLICATION No. 875 of 1993
 

In
COMPANY PETITION No. 62 of 1986
 

With


 

COMPANY
APPLICATION No. 767 of 1993
 

In
COMPANY PETITION No. 62 of 1986
 

 
=========================================================

 

ESMA
INDUSTRIES PVT LTD - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

SAURASHTRA
CEMENT & CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LIMITED & 19 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
PRASHANT G DESAI for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR BH CHHATRAPATI for Respondent(s) : 1,
3, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2,4 -
20. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 06/05/2010 

 

 
 


 

ORAL
ORDER 

Mr.Prashant G. Desai, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has placed on record consent terms arrived at between the parties before the mediator dtd.20/2/2010. The said consent terms is directed to be taken on record. In view of the above, Mr.Prashant G. Desai, learned senior advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the main petition being Company Petition No.62 of 1986 to which Mr.Chhatrapati, learned advocate for the contesting respondent has no objection.

Accordingly and in view of the above, Company Petition No.62 of 1986 is dismissed as withdrawn. However, it is observed and made clear that this Court has not entered into the merits of the Company Petition and/or the allegations of mismanagement etc. made in the Company Petition No.62 of 1986 and/or with respect to the consent terms arrived between the parties, on the basis of which the petitioner has withdrawn the present Company Petition. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on merits with respect to any transaction between the parties present and/or future (pursuant to the consent terms arrived at between the parties).

As the Company Petition No.62 of 1986 is withdrawn, Company Application Nos.57/1986, 86/1986, 4/1992, 875/1993 and 767/1993 are hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Interim relief / direction, if any, granted in the aforesaid Company Applications stand vacated forthwith without expressing anything with respect to the consequences, if any, pursuant to the interim relief/directions issued by this Court in any of the aforesaid Company Applications. Present Company Petition and the respective Company Applications are dismissed as withdrawn with above observations. No costs.

[M.R. SHAH, J.] rafik     Top