Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Smt.Vedanti W/O Rohit Barshi vs Sri Rhohit S/O Jayaraj Barshi on 4 December, 2017

Author: Rathnakala

Bench: Rathnakala

                            1


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
                  KALABURAGI BENCH


       DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017


                        PRESENT

         THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA
                          AND
       THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.SUDHINDRARAO


              MFA NO.201295/2016 (F.C)


Between:

Smt. Vedanti W/o Rohit Barshi,
Age: 27 years, Occ: Household work,
R/o: C/o: B-10 Praid estate,
Aashar estate, Opp. Upanagar Naka,
Nashik-6
Maharashtra State.

                                             ... Appellant
(By Sri Shivashankar H.Manur, Advocate)


And:

Sri Rhohit S/o Jayaraj Barshi,
Age: 29 years, Occ: Nil,
R/o: J.M.Road, Opp. Darbar House,
Gujjar Galli, Vijaypur-586101.

                                            ... Respondent

(By Sri.Sanganabasava. B.Patil, Advocate)
                             2


      This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under
Section 28(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, R/w Sec.19(1)
of Family Courts Act, 1984, praying (a) Call for records
pertaining to the judgment and order dated 14.09.2015
passed by the Judge, Family Court, Vijaypur, in
M.C.No.153/2015, (b) Set-aside the judgment and order
dated 14.09.2015 passed by the Judge, Family Court,
Vijaypur, in M.C.No.153/2015.


    This appeal coming on for orders          this    day,
RATHNAKALA J., delivered the following:


                     JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 28.11.2017, which reads thus :-

"Memo Regd. Not Pressed Herein, the appellant most respectfully submits as under:
That the appellant and respondent have settled their dispute before the Trial Court as such the above appeal does not survive for consideration. As such the appellant is seeking not press of the above appeal.
Wherefore, it is prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to dismiss the 3 above appeal as not press, in the interest of justice and equity".

In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

No costs.

Sd/-

JUDGE Sd/-

JUDGE sn/SMP