Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 15]

Chattisgarh High Court

Meena Devi Dewangan vs State Of Chhattisgarh 76 Wps/7741/2018 ... on 28 November, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                                                                    NAFR

                        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                                       WPT No. 231 of 2018

              • Meena Devi Dewangan W/o Late Shri Ramgopal Dewangan Aged
                About 62 Years R/o 102 R. S. Marg, Raniroad, Near Town School
                Champa, District Janjgir Champa, Chhattisgarh. Through Its Power Of
                Attorney Holder Kamal Kishore Dewangan S/o Late Shri Ramgopal
                Dewangan, Aged About 33 Years. R/o 102 R. S. Marg, Raniroad, Near
                Town School Champa, District Janjgir- Champa, Chhattisgarh.,
                District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

                                                                           ---- Petitioner

                                                Versus

              1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Transport
                 Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur,
                 Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

              2. Regional Transport Officer/ Taxation Authority Raipur, District Raipur,
                 Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

                                                                       ---- Respondents

For Petitioner Shri S. K. Bajpai, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Anand Dadariya, Dy. GA Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 28/11/2018

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that since the family of the petitioner has more than one vehicle, the papers of some other vehicle have been annexed to the writ petition, therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to prefer a duly constituted writ petition afresh.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

Sd/-

Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Nirala