Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

National Green Tribunal

Puducherry Environment Protection ... vs Union Of India Rep By Its Secretary The ... on 17 June, 2021

Bench: K Ramakrishnan, K. Satyagopal

Item No.11 to 13:

              BEFORE THE NATIONAL GREEN TRIBUNAL
                    SOUTHERN ZONE, CHENNAI

                        M.A. No.125 & 152/2016 (SZ) in
                    Original Application No. 103 of 2016 (SZ)

                                       With
                          M.A. No.126 of 2016 (SZ) in
                          Appeal No.123 of 2016 (SZ)
                                       With

                 Original Application No.161 of 2017 (SZ)
                            (Through Video Conference)



IN THE MATTER OF:

Puducherry Environment Protection Association
                                                                  ...Applicant(s)
                                        Versus

Union of India and Ors.
                                                                ...Respondent(s)

                                            With

Puducherry Environment Protection Association
                                                                  ...Applicant(s)
                                        Versus

Union of India and Ors. .
                                                                ...Respondent(s)

                                     With
Puducherry Environment Protection Association
                                                                  ...Applicant(s)
                                        Versus

The District Environmental Engineer,
Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board,

                                        1
 Cuddalore and Anr.
                                                             ...Respondent(s)

Date of hearing: 17.06.2021.
CORAM:

      HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER

      HON'BLE DR. K. SATYAGOPAL, EXPERT MEMBER

M.A. No.125 & 152/2016 (SZ) in
Original Application No. 103 of 2016 (SZ)
For Applicant(s):              Mr. A. Yogeshwaran
For Respondent(s):             Ms. Ojas Sivakumar for Mr. M.R. Gokul
                               Krishnan for R1
                               Ms. Me. Sarashwathy for R2
                               Mr. C. Kasirajan through Ms. Ashwini for R3 &
                               R4
                               Mr. S.Sai Sathyajth for R5

M.A. No.126 of 2016 (SZ) in
Appeal No.123 of 2016 (SZ)

For Appellant(s):              Mr. A. Yogeshwaran
For Respondent(s):             Ms. Ojas Sivakumar for Mr. M.R. Gokul
                               Krishnan for R1
                               Ms. Me. Sarashwathy for R2
                               Mr. C. Kasirajan through Ms. Ashwini for R3 &
                               R4
                               Mr. S.Sai Sathyajth for R5

Original Application No.161 of 2017 (SZ)

For Applicant(s):              Mr. A. Yogeshwaran
For Respondent(s):             Mr. C. Kasirajan through Ms. Ashwini for R1


                                      2
                               Mr. S. Sai Sathyajith for R2


                                   ORDER

1. The above case has been posted today for hearing. When the matter came up for hearing today Mr. A. Yogeshwaran represented the applicant in all these cases. Ms. Ojas Sivakumar for Mr. M.R. Gokul Krishnan represented 1st respondent in O.A. No. 103/2016 and Appeal No. 123/2016, Ms. Me. Sarashwathy represented 2nd respondent in O.A. No. 103/2016 and Appeal No. 123/2016, Mr. C. Kasirajan through Ms. Ashwini represented respondents 3 and 4 in O.A. No. 103/2016 and Appeal No. 123/2016 and 2nd respondent in O.A. NO. 161/2017 and Mr. S. Sai Sathyajith represented 5th respondent in O.A. No. 103/2016 and Appeal No. 123/2016 and 2nd respondent in O.A. No. 161/2017.

2. Learned Counsel appearing for the project proponent submitted that they have engaged a senior counsel to argue the matter and they want some time to get ready with the matter as there is some inconvenience to Senior Counsel and they could not get ready with matter today.

3. The matters are of the year 2016 and 2017 respectively, however, considering the request made that they want senior engagement, we feel that accommodation can be given. No further adjournment will be given on next date of hearing.

3

4. For hearing, post on 22.06.2021.

...................................J.M. (Justice K. Ramakrishnan) ................................E.M. (Shri. Dr. K. Satyagopal) M.A. Nos. 125&152/2016 in O.A. No. 103/2016(SZ)& M.A. No. 126/2016 in O.A. No. 123/2016(SZ)& O.A. No. 161/2017(SZ) 17th June, 2021. (AM) 4