Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Varadha Bhai Amma vs State Of Kerala on 6 June, 2014

Author: K.Ramakrishnan

Bench: K.Ramakrishnan

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                       THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN

                    FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/16TH JYAISHTA, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 11220 of 2014 (B)
                                      ----------------------------

PETITIONER :
--------------------

            VARADHA BHAI AMMA, AGED 69 YEARS
            W/O.LATE.N.CHELLAPPA KURUP, YETTOOTTU VEEDU
            PAKALKURI DESOM, PAKALKURI POST, VARKALA TALUK
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695604.

            BY ADV. SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR

RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------

        1. STATE OF KERALA
            REP. BY THE ADDL.CHIEF SECRETARY
            DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVT. SECRETARIATE
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695001.

        2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
            PIN - 695001.

        3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER
            PALLIKKAL POLICE STATION, ATTINGAL
            THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695604.

            R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT. S. HYMA


            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
            ON 06-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
            FOLLOWING:


Mn



                     K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
            ------------------------------------------------
                   W.P.(C) No.11220 of 2014
            -------------------------------------------------
             Dated this the 6th day of June, 2014

                            JUDGMENT

When the application came up for hearing today, learned counsel for petitioner, on the basis of the statement filed by the State Attorney, in which it is stated that considering the relationship between the parties when a preliminary inquiry was conducted, it was revealed that no such incident happened, no crime was registered, which according to the petitioner is not true, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to pursue his remedy provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure by filing a private complaint before the appropriate forum. Above submission of the Counsel for petitioner is recorded and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the above liberty.

K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE vdv