Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Vidyadevi Dasrathbhai Maheshwari vs Custodian . on 11 February, 2016

Bench: M.Y. Eqbal, Arun Mishra

     ITEM NO.105                            COURT NO.8                   SECTION IX

                               S U P R E M E C O U R T O F          I N D I A
                                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

     Civil Appeal             No(s).    5849/2007

     VIDYADEVI DASRATHBHAI MAHESHWARI                                    Appellant(s)

                                                    VERSUS

     CUSTODIAN & ORS.                                                    Respondent(s)

     (with appln. (s) for early hearing and office report)

     WITH
     C.A. No. 5850/2007

     Date : 11/02/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA

     For Appellant(s)
                                       Mr. Subrat Birla, Adv.
                                       Mr. S. C. Birla,Adv.

     For Respondent(s)
                                       Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewari,Adv.
                                       Mr. Abhishek Tewari, Adv.

                                       Mr. Surya Kant,Adv.


                          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                             O R D E R

These appeals are disposed of in terms of the signed order.

[INDU POKHRIYAL] [SUKHBIR PAUL KAUR] COURT MASTER A.R.-CUM-P.S. (Signed order is placed on the file) Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sukhbir Paul Kaur Date: 2016.02.12 16:16:57 IST Reason: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5849 OF 2007 VIDYADEVI DASRATHBHAI MAHESHWARI Appellant(s) Versus CUSTODIAN AND OTHERS Respondent(s) W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5850 OF 2007 O R D E R

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

2. In our view, the High Court, without considering the reasoning shown by the appellant, has passed the impugned order.

3. Further, in view of the ratio decided by this Court in the case of Varghese K. Joseph versus Custodian and others reported in (2011) 3 SCC 394, these matters were required to be remanded back to the High Court.

4. However, having regard to the fact that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents fairly submitted that now a direction be issued to the Special Court for certification within -2- three months from the date of filing of the application by the appellant.

5. Ordered accordingly.

6. The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of.

........................J. (M.Y. EQBAL) ........................J. (ARUN MISHRA) New Delhi, February 11, 2016