Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati

Y.Manmadha Rao vs The State Of Andhra Pradesh on 13 July, 2022

Author: Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi

Bench: Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi

Two THOUS SAND J AND 7
: PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KONGARA VIJAYA LARSHM

WRIT PETITION NO: 20219 OF 2022,

WENTY TWO

wo

Between:

¥. Manmadha Reo, S/o.Krishnam Naidu, Aged about 53 years, Gece. Deputy Assi
CorTissionen( STs, Réo. Plot No. 19?, Krishnan aipvam, 100 Ft Road, Vigianagaram.

Petitioner

Stan

AND
1, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by 8 Princinal Sex oratary, Department af
Gammiercial Tax (Revenue), os OF retatia i Buildings, Arnaravatl, Guntur District.
The ¢ "het Commissioner (State Tax), ¥ iayawada, Andhra Pradesh,
Joint Commissioner (State Tan), Vigia naga ram Division, Andhra Pradesh
The Secretary to Vigilance Compnissioner, Anshra Pradesh, Vigiance
Gammissioner, Valar Gapudh :

Bs tat Bo

Respondents
Petition under Article 226 ) of the Constitution of india praying that in the clroumstances
Stated in the affidav' fled therewith, the High Court may be clessed to declare the
action of the respondents in not consider! mg the meiiioner fer rom Stan ta the post of
comings rcial Officer/Assistant Cornmissians r OST) along with poten val promotion and
seniority inn the disabled cateqany orthonaedi iggy he andi wrapped 8S diegal, arbitrary and

a

violative of a ics 14, 168 and 21 of the Constitution of ind! and also in violation of

OMs.No.23, Sted 26.605 201. meinen GO. Me. Ne oe "dated WIG 2OTT and.

ansequentiy direct b he respondents fo on ser the ps oner for promotion | to the post
of Commercial ONicer/Assistant Comynissioner (S T} 8 along with notional promotion and
seriariy, ao

iA NOs { OF 2022

Petition under Section 154 CPC is ' led, : raying that in the circumstances stated

@ affidavit fled in Support of the wnt petiion, the High Court may be pleasad to
noreider ihe representations made by the e pe ft oner an 20.09. 8027 and 23.04.2022 for
promotion tn the gost of Commercial OffoarAssistant Oomm) 888) oner (87) along with
Hovional promotion and seniority without reference fo the G. O.RENO. 382 Revenue
(Vigiance-l Department dated 33.04.2020 ag and when a DPC is forrned for
Dramoation, pending disposal of WE 230218 of 2022, an the fle of the Hi} gh Gourk

The petition coming on for hearing, upon pe erusing the Petition and the affid Javil
a fed in support thereof and upon hearl ing 'the. argumenis of Si GR Sudhakar, Advocate
or the Petitioner, GP for Servioas | for the Respondents, the Court made the following.
ORDER

"Learned Government Pisader sesks Sme to fle counter affidavit in this matter"

| in the meanwhile, the respondents are directed to examine the representations made by the petitioner, dated 20.09.9034 and 23.04.2022 to the 2° respondent and iake a decision airictly in accordance with IW, a expeditiously 88 possible, preferably within a period of sight {08} wesks from the date of receipt ofa copy of this Order. List the matier on G7.09.2022." ' Sd). B. VINOO KUMAR ASSISTANT REGIS STAR Ns eee HYRUE COPYH SECTION OFFICER To, fat Gees mG & Jove ncinal Se 4 3 The Fr 4 3 3 Chi

2. The ae Vig Pradesh, Andhra POUT] fh s.

:

fas at Xe a :
Dr F Seem MWS} © Aas ua a CHIPT OF ao eh A x ry Csio GI One spars copy wa y TAR = a.
Y :
te ARAAAwennnsnnannnere erent" HIGH COURT RYE VS 208e * < DATED LIST THE MATTER ON 07.09.2023. ORDER WP. No 20219 of 2022 INTERIM DIRECTION