Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Karnataka High Court

Bangalore University vs Pali Education Society 271 on 26 June, 2008

Bench: Deepak Verma, B. Sreenivase Gowda

'-'-V-M W N'-\-'mnwn rm-'m \-slur?  nnnnmnnn l'1Iia'i"l cuulfi Of IKARNATAKA I-HG!-I COURT OF i(ARNA'l'AKA HSGH COUR? OF KARNA'l'AKA HSGH COURT

m Tim 8168 come'? 01%' KARNATAKA AT mxmmns
mama tmzs tum 2695 my cm Jxmz, 
mam } %  %

am m:>1rm.z mzmmgg  * ~ 

mm HQWBLE   %

 

    AA 
Efi§43fi:LQRE_;.56,..RE!'§5ESEH'TEl3 3"!' ms

   Q ---VB:iI*L'i.'l', mv.)

     socmw :27:

3:341', 2 mm, mm mvmrr
 PRAsHAN1HAHAeAR,PAn'EGARmLYA
2   VIJAYARAGAR WEST, BANGALORE 79
 REPRESENTED av rrs szcnzrm

5%jsR:%¢r:%.sFaLaKssmmURmr

=781'A'IE or-' Kammzraxa
 ayrrs szcazrmvmmw
%   Q1"-zpammzmm or mama El3II{3A'I'I(.T}li!
 HMSBUILDIRG. BAHGALORE1 f



3 saunmnn Fmeroxan wmmms
NA'I"IOH5L common. ma macrmns
mucxrzox, 1 FLOOR, cm mm  
mxrmsw, mmamaz 31    H   R
REPRESEITTEE3 BY rrs R3GIoHALHDmE¢1m_* 

{By Sri: 3 s VHAYALAKSIM3, A:>x%*. ?ciR¢;R:3H%%LM%»HHH H
w12rr.m=mL m.EBh,!s arcs?
HIGH calm ACT Pxamrcs, m  VAASHDE Tm
omaa passsn. I19   WRIT PETPIIGN

mans 17; mo? n.nsrza:2 
ma %w:s: mm   3g   for Pasmmmnv
PEARHWG a:}.f;his:1da;I(;"DEE_P8»Kv .1. delivemd the

 %%%%   em gH1+HH
wan  gm k[Lfu5s heard on merits.

 ' ----  -£5-satisfied witlu the arder passed by

V A '  H  Judge on 25.8.2303 in
;;2«:$317mo<mEnN: prefermd by mponam: no.1
 is befare us in thi Intra Court Appeal.

 H. ' to respondent: Hal, runnmg' an educational

-..uuau ur RAHNAIAKA I-HGI1 COUIDIAI-0.;l' KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT institution, has czrmamad all the requisite infrwstructure WES and other ficilitiea for imparting; educafion to the sundenm dmircus of prasecxmng Necwaary appsmvnl in this rgard has rmpondmt No.1 by Edtmaticn far c:amn1cr10%<£: t;'§''.':iT ':

giavamoe mi' Judge was. that agpim ufnxmany rm mt gnntaacl
3. ifigspundmm 2 & 3 had fiiad their However, the new by was mm' ' m raupcmdent N:ui.'3 m appxwopriataa applhtinn appefiant as as to eomidar ifaxr gantgf Funrm direction was given that as and whm submitted wnuld be expaaianusly and mat hm than outer limit ': fof ~~s. aeaofi to appellanxlfltfivsamity. application my of 5%} tier: can baa £:mxi&' only if educational' ......... ill' ..............u. ruurl uuult; My anxunlnlm man COURT or xAmAmcA HIGH COURT or-' KARNATAKA HIGH COURT as KARNATAKA men COURT 'd>