Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Saroj Kumar Mahapatra vs State Transport Authority ... on 18 May, 2020

Author: P. Sam Koshy

Bench: P. Sam Koshy

                                                                                                      NAFR
                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
                                       WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 959 OF 2020

           Saroj Kumar Mahapatra, S/o Late Bhimsen Mahapatra, aged about 60 years, R/o Kali
           Mandir Chowk, City Bargarh, P.S. Bargarh, District Bargarh (Orissa)
                                                                                      ... Petitioner
                                                    versus
           State Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur
           (CG)
                                                                                  ... Respondent
                  For Petitioner                       :     None appears.
                  For Respondent-State                 :     Ms. Sunita Jain, Govt. Advocate.

                                           Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
                                                    Order on Board
  18/05/2020

1. The limited relief that the Petitioner has sought for is for an appropriate direction to the Respondent to take a decision on the issuance of counter signature for renewal of permanent permit for the route Sambalpur to Raipur via Bargarh, Suhela, Saraipali and return one single trip daily.

2. The application of the Petitioner is pending since 11.11.2019.

3. The respondent authorities themselves vide order dated 24.1.2020 had published specific dates in respect of such claims of different districts to be decided. In spite of that, it appears that the case of the Petitioner has till date not been decided.

4. Given the said fact and also taking note of the order dated 24.1.2020, the present Writ Petition is being disposed of directing the Respondent to take a decision on the application of the Petitioner at the earliest.

5. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(P. Sam Koshy) Judge /sharad/