Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Srikanta Maity vs Ghatal Municipality & Ors on 21 September, 2022

Author: Amrita Sinha

Bench: Amrita Sinha

 Sl. No.29
21.09.2022
Court No.24
   B.M.


                           In The High Court At Calcutta
                          Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
                                  Appellate Side

                                 W.P.A 8468 of 2022

                                     Srikanta Maity
                                        -versus
                                 Ghatal Municipality & Ors.

                        Mr. Indrajit Bhattacharjee
                                                     ... for the Petitioner.
                        Mr. M. Thakur
                        Mr. Swarup Kumar Ghosh
                                   ... for the respondent nos.1, 2 & 3.

Mr. Md. Sarwar Jahan Mr. Sayantan Hazra ... for the respondent no.5 The petitioner alleges that the respondent no.5, who is his father, is making unauthorised construction over Dag No.37, Mouza-Nischindapur, J. L. No.31, Khatian No.4030 without obtaining any sanction plan/permission from the Ghatal Municipality.

A representation has been filed by the petitioner before the Municipality on 12 th April, 2022. The petitioner alleges that the same has not been taken up for consideration till date.

Learned advocate representing the respondent no.5 submits that construction is being made on his private land in accordance with PMAY Scheme. It has been submitted that permission was granted by the Municipality for making such construction. 2 Learned advocate representing the Municipality does not have any instruction in the matter.

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Executive Officer and the Chairman of the Board of Councillors, Ghatal Municipality, the respondent no.2 to give an opportunity of hearing to the father and the son and to decide the issue of unauthorised construction.

An opportunity of hearing be given to the parties to produce all relevant documents in respect of their respective claims.

A reasoned order shall be passed by the aforesaid respondent at the earliest but positively within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order.

Writ petition stands disposed of.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on completion of usual formalities.

( Amrita Sinha, J.)