Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court - Itanagar

Techi Puru vs The State Of Ap And 4 Ors on 27 January, 2026

                                                                                Page No.# 1/2

GAHC040018022025




                           THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
                          (ITANAGAR BENCH)

                               Case No. : W.P.(Crl.)/5/2025

         Techi Puru
         Son of Late Techi Kuli, resident of Village Amba-I, PO and PS Doimukh, Papum Pare
         District, Arunachal Pradesh.

         VERSUS

         The State of AP and 4 Ors
         through the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar.

         2:The Superintendent of Police
         Age: 0
          Occupation :
          Papum Pare District
         Arunachal Pradesh.

         3:The Officer in Charge
         Age: 0
          Occupation :
          Doimukh Police Station
          Papum Pare District
         Arunachal Pradesh.

         4:The Investigating Officer
         Age: 0
          Occupation :
          Doimukh Police Station Case No. 152/ 2025
          Doimukh Police Station
          Papum Pare District
         Arunachal Pradesh.

         5:Tumme Amo
         Age: 0
          Occupation :
                                                                                    Page No.# 2/2

             IPS
             DIG
             ICR
             Itanagar Capital Region
             Police Headquarters
             Chandranagar
             Itanagar
             Arunachal Pradesh

Advocate for the Petitioner   : Nabam Rungri, K Bagra,Lentsothe Sangtam,A Sharma

Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), P P of AP




                                           BEFORE
                 HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

                                           ORDER

Date : 27.01.2026 Heard Mr. N. Rungri, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Also heard Mr. Y. Riram, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent No. 1, who submits that the respondent No. 1 is not filing any affidavit.

Mr. D. Loyi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 4, submits that he has received the instructions and will be filing affidavit-in- opposition within 2 (two) weeks.

In view of above and as prayed for, let this matter be listed after 2 (two) weeks to enable the respondents to file their affidavit-in-opposition.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant