Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

M/S Gps Builders vs The State Of Karnataka on 30 August, 2023

                                                            -1-
                                                                      NC: 2023:KHC-D:9760
                                                                       WP No. 103107 of 2015




                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                                       DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

                                                          BEFORE

                                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 103107 OF 2015 (LB-RES)

                              BETWEEN:

                              1.   M/S. GPS BUILDERS,
                                   PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
                                   REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS:

                              2.   SHRI R. SIDDAGANGAPPA S/O. M. RAJASHEKARAIAH,
                                   AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: FIRST CLASS CONTRACTOR,

                              3.   SHRI P. GOVARDHAN KUMAR
                                   S/O. P. RAMAMOHAN RAO,
                                   AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: FIRST CLASS CONTRACTOR,

                              4.   SHRI SANJAY S/O. MARUTI PATIL,
                                   AGE: 41 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS,
                                   ALL R/O. NO. 555, SECTOR NO.III,
                                   SHIVABASAVANAGAR, BELAGAVI.
                                                                                ...PETITIONERS
                              (BY SRI F.V. PATIL & PRUTHVI K.S., ADVOCATE)

           Digitally signed
           by
           MOHANKUMAR
                              AND:
           B SHELAR
MOHANKUMAR
B SHELAR   Location:
           DHARWAD
           Date:
           2023.09.02
           13:44:46 -0700
                              1.   THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
                                   REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY,
                                   DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
                                   VIKAS SOUDHA, DR. AMBEDKAR BEEDI,
                                   BENGALURU.

                              2.   BELAGAVI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
                                   REPRESENTED BY IT'S COMMISSIONER,
                                   ASHOK NAGAR, BELAGAVI.
                                                                              ...RESPONDENTS
                              (BY SRI P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1, SRI M.A. HULYAL, ADV. FOR R2)

                                   THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
                              OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, IN THE
                                 -2-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC-D:9760
                                        WP No. 103107 of 2015




NATURE OF     CERTIORARI BY      QUASHING   THE   IMPUGNED
ENDORSEMENT DATED 13.10.2014 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT
NO.1 VIDE ANNEXURE-J; ISSUE AN APPROPRIATE DIRECTION BY
DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO ISSUE AN ORDER FOR CHANGE
OF LAND USE FROM PUBLIC AND SEMI PUBLIC USE TO COMMERCIAL
USE IN RESPECT OF THE LANDS BEARING CTS NO.4823/A17,
4823/A18 AND 4828/A1/D, SITUATED AT OLD P.B.ROAD, BY
CONSIDERING THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION
69(2) OF THE 1961 ACT WITHOUT REFERENCE TO MASTER PLAN
(REVISED-2) OF BELAGAVI 2014, IN TERMS OF THE ORDER PASSED
BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.108617/2014 C/W.
W.P.NO.108481/2014   (GM-RES)     DATED   03.12.2014   VIDE
ANNEXURE-K.

      THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN
'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                            ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioners on instruction submits that captioned writ petition has become infructuous. It is also brought to the notice of this court that respondents have passed an order for change of land.

The said statement is taken on record. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/-

JUDGE MBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61