Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Chattisgarh High Court

Rishi Raj Bhrigu Sanskrit Samajik ... vs State Of Chhattisgarh 60 Wpc/3295/2018 ... on 4 December, 2018

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                  1

                                                                  NAFR

       HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                       WPC No. 3313 of 2018

    Rishi Raj Bhrigu Sanskrit Samajik Shiksha Samiti Titurdih Durg,
     Address H.No. 460, Ward No. 15, Titurdih, Durg, Through Its
     Secretary, Brijesh Mishra, S/o Satya Prasad Mishra, Aged About
     61 Years, R/o. A/8, Street No. 2, Panchshil Nagar, Borasi Colony,
     Durg, P.S. Pulgaon, District Durg Chhattisgarh

                                                       ---- Petitioner

                              Versus

  1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of
     School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar,
     Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

  2. The Director, Directorate Of Public Education, Raipur, District
     Raipur Chhattisgarh

  3. The Commissioner, Directorate Of Public Education, Raipur,
     District Raipur Chhattisgarh

  4. The District Education Officer, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh

  5. The Block Education        Officer,   Dhamdha,    District    Durg
     Chhattisgarh

  6. Chhattisgarh Sanskrit Vidyamandal Raipur, Through The
     Secretary, Chhattisgarh Sanskrit Vidyamandal Premise Of
     Directorate Of Public Instruction, Pension Bada, Raipur, District
     Raipur Chhattisgarh

                                                      ---- Respondent
For Petitioner           None
For Respondent/State     Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. GA



                        Order On Board By

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra 4/12/2018

1. Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner 2 even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.

2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-

(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Shyna