Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

U. Gopalakrishnan vs The Special Tahsildar on 2 January, 2013

Author: Siri Jagan

Bench: S.Siri Jagan, C.K.Abdul Rehim

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                               PRESENT:

                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SIRI JAGAN
                                   &
              THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM

        WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JANUARY 2013/12TH POUSHA 1934

                      LA.App..No. 484 of 2012 ()
                      --------------------------
                LAR.20/2008 of ADDL.SUB COURT, PALAKKAD

APPELLANT(S):
------------

           U. GOPALAKRISHNAN,
           S/O UNNIKRISHNAN,
           CHELLANKAVUKALAM,
           KANCHIKODE, PUDUSSERI,
           PALAKKAD,PIN 678 623.



         BY ADV. SRI.T.R.RAJAN

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

     1.    THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR,
           L.A.(G) NO.1, PALAKKAD - 678 001.

     2.    THE SECRETARY, PALAKKAD MUNICIPALITY,
           PALAKKAD - 678 001.


       BY ADV. SRI.T.C.SURESH MENON
       BY ADV. SRI.P.S.APPU
       BY ADV. SRI.A.R.NIMOD
       BY ADV. SRI.K.A.ANAS
       BY  GOVERNMENT PLEADER E.M. ABDUL KHADER

       THIS LAND ACQUISITION APPEAL  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON
       02-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




ds



       S. SIRI JAGAN & C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JJ.

               -------------------------------------------------
                    L.A.A No. 484 OF 2012
               -------------------------------------------------
       DATED THIS THE 2nd DAY OF JANUARY, 2013

                          J U D G M E N T

Siri Jagan, J:

This appeal is filed against the judgment of the Sub Court Palakkad in LAR No.20/2008. As per a notification dated 10-01-1981 under Section 3 (1) of the erstwhile Land Acquisition Act, 2.98 cents of dry land was acquired from the petitioner. Dissatisfied with, the compensation fixed by the Land Acquisition officer the reference came up before the Sub Court at the instance of the Appellant. The appellant claims at least Rs.7,000/- per cent as compensation whereas the reference court granted only Rs.4,000/- per cent. We find that, under the same acquisition, in another appeal, namely LAA No.93/1993, this court has fixed the land value for similar land at Rs.4,000/- per cent. As such we are of the opinion that so far as that value has been given to the appellant no further LAA No.484/2012 -2- modification in land value can be given to the appellant. Accordingly the Land Acquisition Appeal is dismissed.
Sd/-
S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE.
Sd/-
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
AMG True copy P.A to Judge