Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Ram Chander & Ors Etc.Etc. vs The State Of Haryana & Ors Etc.Etc. on 13 February, 2014

2!
                          IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
                          CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                    REVIEW PETITION (C)NOS. 58-81 OF 2014
                                     IN
                     CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5630-5653 OF 2013

RAM CHANDER & ORS. ETC. ETC.                              ... PETITIONER(S)

                 VERSUS

STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. ETC.                   ... RESPONDENT(S)


                                      WITH

                     REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 2591 OF 2013
                                     IN
                        CIVIL APPEAL NO.5666 OF 2013

SUSAN ANAND                                         ... PETITIONER(S)

                 VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.                                  ... RESPONDENT(S)


                                      WITH

                     REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 3013 OF 2013
                                     IN
                        CIVIL APPEAL NO.5661 OF 2013

V.K. JINDAL                                         ... PETITIONER(S)

                 VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.                                  ... RESPONDENT(S)

                                      WITH

                     REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 3128 OF 2013
                                     IN
                        CIVIL APPEAL NO.5665 OF 2013

PROF. SHASHI KULBHUSHAN SHARMA                      ... PETITIONER(S)

                 VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.                                  ... RESPONDENT(S)




                                      : 2 :

                                      WITH

                     REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 3194 OF 2013
                                     IN
                        CIVIL APPEAL NO.5654 OF 2013

AVTAR SINGH                                         ... PETITIONER(S)

                 VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.                                   ... RESPONDENT(S)
                                     O R D E R


            Applications for oral hearing is rejected.
            We have carefully gone through the Review Petitions and the
connected papers. We see no reason to interfere with the order impugned.
The Review Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed.



                                                      .......................J.
                                           (H.L. DATTU)



                                                      .......................J.
                                           (SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR)



                                                      .......................J.
                                           (J. CHELAMESWAR)

NEW DELHI;
FEBRUARY 13, 2014
CHAMBER MATTER                                                SECTION IV


              S U P R E M E    C O U R T   O F    I N D I A
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 58-81 OF 2014 IN CIVIL APPEAL NOS.5630-5653/2013

RAM CHANDER & ORS ETC.ETC.                            Petitioner(s)

                   VERSUS

THE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS ETC.ETC.                   Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for oral hearing)


WITH REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 2591 OF 2013 IN CIVIL APPEAL
NO.5666 OF 2013


WITH REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 3013 OF 2013 IN CIVIL APPEAL
NO.5661 OF 2013

WITH REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 3128 OF 2013 IN CIVIL APPEAL
NO.5665 OF 2013

WITH REVIEW PETITION (C)NO. 3194 OF 2013 IN CIVIL APPEAL
NO.5654 OF 2013



Date: 13/02/2014    These Petitions were circulated today.


CORAM :
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR
          HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR


      By Circulation
                               : 2 :

      UPON perusing papers the Court made the following
                          O R D E R

Applications for oral hearing and de-tagging are rejected.

The Review Petitions are dismissed, in terms of the signed order.

 (G.V.Ramana)                             (Vinod Kulvi)
Court Master                              Asstt.Registrar

(signed order is placed on the file)